IN THIS ISSUE
|
ADVERTISEMENT
Be a Chatter Box: Join Chief Chat
Got something on your mind? Join the growing of community
of marketers on the Chief Chat forums and let us know your thoughts.
Controversial ideas, opinions and rants welcome—and
encouraged. |
06/24/09
And from the print-publisher-in-utter-denial file comes
news that the Newport, RI Daily News is changing its pricing structure
to punish people who want to read their news only online.
The Daily News will now charge $145 annually to a newspaper subscriber,
$245 if a subscriber wants the paper and access to the paper’s Web
site—and, if you can believe it, $345 if the subscriber only wants the
Web site.
Yep, The Daily News is charging subscribers more than twice for its
content online than for its printed edition.
Bold? Yes. Stupid? Double plus yes.
READ ARTICLE
06/24/09
Back in 1999 e-mail marketing was all the rage. It seems
as today, it is getting a lot of attention again but for much different
reasons.
Ten years ago, the subject line was the key qualifier to determine which
messages would get your attention. Today, a decent open rate can boil
down to whether your audience perceives value or credibility in your
From/Sender line.
READ ARTICLE
06/24/09
As part of its ongoing effort to get ad buyers to look
beyond the click, the Online Publisher's Association has released a
study claiming that consumers exposed to a brand’s advertising are
more likely to visit the brand’s site, view more of the brand’s
site’s Web pages and spend more money on related products or
services.
READ ARTICLE
06/24/09
Is being willfully ignorant a prerequisite for getting a
job as a consumer news reporter? A lot of the time, it sure seems
so.
Case in point: last week’s coverage of Forrester Research’s forecast
that e-mail marketing spending will hit $2 billion by 2014.
The trades all got it right. After all, it was a fairly straightforward
reporting assignment on the projected growth of e-mail marketing.
However, with most consumer reporters seemingly having a tourettes-like
need to identify all commercial e-mail as spam, it wasn’t entirely
surprising that the Wall Street Journal and the Boston Globe published
blurbs implying that Forrester’s forecast was a prediction on the
growth of spam.
READ ARTICLE
|