View this email as a Web page Please add Corn e-Digest to your Safe Sender list.
Corn E-Digest
 BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE PUBLISHERS OF THE CORN AND SOYBEAN DIGEST Subscribe Unsubscribe Preferences Contact Us 
  November 5, 2007 A Penton Media Property Volume 2, Number 18  
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Three Top Tips For Managing Continuous Corn

Study Reveals Too Much N Can Lower Corn Yields

Corn Prices At Marketing Year High

How Long Will The Good Times Last?

Grain Sales Boost U.S. Ag Export Value

Commodity Classic Registration, Housing Reservations Open

Late Corn Harvest Brings Insurance, Aflatoxin Problems

Nearly Three Out Of Four Americans Want Increased Renewable Fuel Use, Production

Follow The Rules When Planting Transgenic Corn

Renewable Energy Conference Focuses On Southern Ohio Opportunities

Risk Management Course Offered For Women In Agriculture

Golf Goes 'Green' With New Natural-Derived Fertilizer

U of I Students Take Robotic Harvesting System On The Road

Payoff From Polymer Seed Coats: A Note From The Corn E-Digest Editor



Key Kernel
Three Top Tips For Managing Continuous Corn
Farmers who want to grow corn following corn in 2008 will need to address three difficult challenges to be successful, says Bob Nielsen, Purdue University Extension agronomist.

The first hurdle is crop residue management. "Too much crop residue can create interference with the planter," says Nielsen. "In no-till or reduced-till situations, the challenge is even greater. This year there were a lot of problems with clods, root balls and inadequate seed-to-soil contact in fields planted to second-year or continuous corn."

The second challenge is hybrid selection. "It is imperative to select a high-yielding hybrid that is also disease-resistant," advises Nielsen. "In Indiana, gray leaf spot and northern corn leaf blight are the two major diseases that corn growers need to protect against."

Finally, the third difficulty is the possibility of having to apply more nitrogen (N) fertilizer and still reap potentially lower yields than what is typical for corn planted after soybeans. "To achieve top yields, N fertilizer requirements are generally 30-50 lbs. more in continuous corn than in corn following soybeans," says Nielsen. "Yields of continuous corn, however, often range from 3% to 20% less than rotation corn -- the magnitude of loss depending on how well growers manage the risks associated with continuous cropping."

For more detailed tips on how to avoid a yield drop when planting continuous or second-year corn, read the newly updated publication, "Mitigate the Downside Risks of Corn Following Corn," at this Web link: www.kingcorn.org/news/timeless/CornCorn.html.

By John Pocock

Cob And Kernel
Study Reveals Too Much N Can Lower Corn Yields
Too much nitrogen (N) fertilizer can be bad for corn yields. Just ask University of Illinois (U of I) soil scientists Saeed Khan, Richard Mulvaney, Tim Ellsworth, and Charlie Boast. Their paper "The Myth Of Nitrogen Fertilization for Soil Carbon Sequestration" is published in the November/December 2007 issue of the Journal of Environmental Quality. Their research shows that too much N fertilizer decreases carbon levels, which could decrease corn yields.

"It is truly fortunate that researchers over the past 100 years have been diligent in collecting and storing samples from the U of I Morrow Plots in order to check how management practices have affected soil properties," says Khan. "We were intrigued that corn growth and yields had been about 20% lower during the past 50 years for the north (continuous corn) than for the south (corn-oats-hay) end of the Morrow Plots, despite considerably greater inputs of N and residues."

To understand why yields were lower for plots that received the most N, Khan and his colleagues analyzed samples for organic carbon in the soil to identify changes that have occurred since the onset of synthetic N fertilization in 1955. "What we learned is that after five decades of massive inputs of residue carbon ranging from 90 to 124 tons/acre, all of the residue carbon had disappeared, and there had been a net decrease in soil organic carbon that averaged 4.9 tons/acre," says Kahn. "Regardless of the crop rotation, the decline became much greater with the higher N rate."

The findings have troubling implications for corn production due to the widespread use of yield-based N recommendations since the 1970s, says Mulvaney. "The one-size-fits-all approach was intended to minimize the risk of N deficiency as insurance for high yields," he explains. "Unfortunately, the usual result is over-fertilization because of the assumption that the fertilizer supplies more N than the soil. The opposite is true in most cases, and especially for the highly productive soils of the Corn Belt that receive the highest N rates."

The Morrow Plot research results are confirmed in published literature from field studies that include initial soil organic carbon data. "In numerous publications spanning more than 100 years and a wide variety of cropping and tillage practices, we found consistent evidence of an organic carbon decline for fertilized soils throughout the world and including much of the Corn Belt besides Illinois," says Boast.

N fertilizers are important for corn production, confirms Ellsworth. "But, excessive application rates cut profits and are bad for soils and the environment," he adds. "The loss of soil carbon has many adverse consequences for productivity, one of which is to decrease water storage."

Because soils differ in their capacities to supply N, Khan and his colleagues stress the need for soil testing, ideally on a site-specific basis, as a prerequisite to soil-based N management that optimizes fertilizer rates. In comparing USDA data for Iowa and Illinois -- the two states that rank highest in corn production -- they found that from 1994 to 2001, annual grain yields in Iowa averaged 1.7 billion bushels with 740,000 tons of N, as compared to an average of 1.5 billion bushels produced in Illinois with 847,000 tons of N. The difference, Khan says, translates into lower fertilizer efficiency that cost Illinois farmers $68 million/year.

The abstract and full text article on this U of I research can be found at: jeq.scijournals.org/cgi/content/full/36/6/1821.

Source: University of Illinois
Corn Prices At Marketing Year High
Cash corn prices in some markets are at the highest level for the marketing year that began on Sept. 1. The recent strength reflects higher futures prices and a stronger basis.

The average cash corn price in central Illinois briefly dipped below $3 in mid-September and was just above $3 on Oct. 8. That average, however, was at $3.47 on Oct. 26. Since reaching a low of about $3.35 in early October, December 2007 corn futures settled at $3.72 on Oct. 26. The average basis in central Illinois was extremely weak in the pre-harvest and early harvest period, with cash bids on Sept. 20 averaging about 50¢ under December futures. The weak basis pattern was widespread throughout the Midwest. On Oct. 26, the average central-Illinois cash bid was 25¢ under December futures, very close to a "normal" level.

Higher futures prices and a stronger basis have developed in spite of an extremely large crop, the need for corn to be stored in temporary facilities and high transportation costs. The strength reflects a continuation of strong export demand, higher energy costs, concerns about U.S. acreage in 2008 and a slowdown in the rate of farmer sales of the newly harvested crop. In addition, storage shortages may not have been as severe as generally expected.

To continue reading this article, click here: www.farmdoc.uiuc.edu/marketing/weekly/html/102907.html.

By Darrel Good, University of Illinois marketing specialist
   ADVERTISEMENT
COUNTER 15G IS BACK. SMART MOVE.
It's back ---- the proven broad-spectrum control of rootworm, nematodes and other problem pests only COUNTER® 15G insecticide-nematicide delivers. Boost yields in genetics and get the most out of refuge acres ---- COUNTER® 15G now in SmartBox or Lock'n'Load. Smart Move.
Go to www.amvac-chemical.com

How Long Will The Good Times Last?
Are the current boom times for U.S. farmers the start of a new era or merely a prelude to historical pattern ending in a bust? Answering these and other related questions will be the focus of three programs in December sponsored by University of Illinois (U of I) Extension.

The 2007 Illinois Farm Economic Summit, to be held Dec. 11 in Effingham, Dec. 12 in Bloomington and Dec. 13 in Sycamore, is the successor to the Farm Income Seminar series held in past years, says Paul Ellinger, U of I Extension farm finance specialist who is organizing the program.

"We've revised and retooled the program to reflect the immediate situation," says Ellinger. "Farm profits are at an all-time high this year. Net farm income for the U.S. is forecast to be $87.1 billion, up $28.1 billion from 2006 and $29.7 billion above its 10-year average of $57.4 billion. A question on everyone's mind is: Will the good times last?"

At each meeting, speakers from U of I Extension's farmdoc team will explore the farm profitability outlook from several perspectives.

"These include the direction of prices, new farm policies, new technology and corn and soybean yields, bio-fuels, production costs and farm lease trends," says Ellinger. "The format will be fast-paced and allow plenty of time for questions from the audience."

Joining Ellinger on the program will be Darrel Good, Bob Hauser, Scott Irwin, Dale Lattz, Nick Paulson and Gary Schnitkey, all from the U of I Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics and part of the farmdoc team. Todd Gleason, an Extension communications specialist, will moderate the meeting.

Registration for each location is $50/person and includes all meeting materials, breaks and lunch. Registration at the door will be $55 as space permits. Each meeting begins at 8 a.m. with registration and concludes at 3 p.m.

Online registration is available at farmdoc ( www.farmdoc.uiuc.edu) by filling out a registration form and returning it with a check for $50 payable to the University of Illinois. Brochures and other information may be obtained by contacting Sue Esposito at (217) 333-5506. Registration brochures will also be available at the local U of I Extension unit office.

The Effingham meeting will be held at the Keller Convention Center. The Interstate Center is the site of the Bloomington meeting and the Sycamore meeting will be in the Center for Agriculture.

Source: University of Illinois Extension
Grain Sales Boost U.S. Ag Export Value
USDA has raised its forecasts for U.S. corn and sorghum exports to the highest levels in nearly two decades. Buoyed in part by U.S. corn and sorghum sales, the value of U.S. agricultural exports rose $1 billion compared to last year. Estimated exports of U.S. corn were increased by 100 million bushels and U.S. sorghum by 40 million bushels.

This is particularly good news for U.S. grain producers as corn demand for ethanol was lowered by 100 million bushels for the second consecutive month.

Ken Hobbie, U.S. Grains Council president and CEO, also noted that the organization's market building programs have introduced ethanol co-products such as distiller's grains and corn gluten in markets from Morocco to Taiwan.

According to USDA's Oct. 12 World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates, U.S. corn production is expected to reach 13.3 billion bushels and 2007-2008 exports are projected to be 2.35 billion bushels, the most in 18 years. USDA also lowered China's corn production by 157 million bushels, to 5.6 billion bushels.

To read this article in its entirety, click here: deltafarmpress.com/news/071029-grain-sales/.

Source: Delta Farm Press
Commodity Classic Registration, Housing Reservations Open
Registration and housing reservations are now being accepted for Commodity Classic, the combined convention and trade show of the American Soybean Association, the National Corn Growers Association and the National Association of Wheat Growers. The event will be held Feb. 28-March 1, 2008 at the Gaylord Opryland Resort in Nashville, TN.

Commodity Classic will feature valuable educational sessions, cutting-edge technological demonstrations, association banquets, entertainment events and important networking opportunities. For more information, visit www.commodityclassic.com.

Source: National Corn Growers Association
Late Corn Harvest Brings Insurance, Aflatoxin Problems
Late corn harvest due to wet weather could mean problems with crop insurance claims and aflatoxin damage.

Farmers need to contact their insurance provider if corn is left in the field beyond the Dec. 10 deadline for insurance claims. Then the agent can submit or open a claim on behalf of the farmer for use after the insurance period. Farmers can't just give up on the crop because the insurance period has expired and expect to receive an indemnity payment for a full loss.

If there is any corn in the field and it can't be harvested, the insurance adjuster will follow the crop through the winter. They may deem it unharvestable at some point, but that's up to the judgment of the insurance company.

Aflatoxin damage can occur if there's ear damage due to drought stress as well as rainfall at the end of the growing season that postpones harvest and prevents drydown. In addition, corn in storage can be contaminated with aflatoxin when corn moisture is above 13% and temperatures are warm. Aflatoxin causes potential health risks for humans, as well as livestock.

If aflatoxin or mold is present, an insurance appraisal and adjustment must be done before the crop is harvested. If not, there can be no adjustment made and thus no indemnity payment. So be sure to contact your insurance agent before you harvest if you suspect this damage.

Each situation is different, so be sure to check with your crop insurance provider. For more information, visit the University of Minnesota Center for Farm Financial Management website, www.cffm.umn.edu. Click on "publications," and "farm management topics."

By Gary Hachfeld, University of Minnesota Extension
Nearly Three Out Of Four Americans Want Increased Renewable Fuel Use, Production
Americans of all stripes agree: We want greater use of renewable fuels like ethanol. According to a new national poll released today by the Renewable Fuels Now Coalition, 74% of Americans believe we should increase our use of domestically produced renewable fuels like ethanol.

In addition, 87% of Americans maintain the federal government should actively support the development of a renewable fuels industry in this country, and 77% think Congress should encourage oil refiners to blend more ethanol into their gasoline products.

"By overwhelming margins, Americans want renewable fuels like ethanol to play a larger role in our nation's energy future," says Renewable Fuels Association President Bob Dinneen, a member of the Renewable Fuels Now Coalition. "The consequences of continuing our dependence on foreign oil are unacceptable. Renewable fuels like ethanol offer our nation an opportunity to go in a new, more sustainable energy direction."

Additional findings include:
  • 77% of Americans want the government to provide incentives to encourage refiners to reduce their use of oil and increase use of renewables.
  • 78% maintain that increasing domestic ethanol production will help create new jobs and improve the economy in rural America.
  • 58% believe more use of domestically produced ethanol will help reduce our dependence on foreign oil.
  • 75% of Americans view ethanol as somewhat important in reducing greenhouse gas emissions, with 41% viewing ethanol as extremely important in reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
Focusing on one of the more popular myths about ethanol production, the poll found that 84% of Americans believe something other than ethanol is at the root cause of rising food prices. Specifically, higher oil prices (46%), increased global demand (15%) and adverse weather conditions like drought (14%) were deemed to have a greater impact on food prices than ethanol production (7%).

For more information about Renewable Fuels Now, click here: www.renewablefuelsnow.org/. For more information about the research findings on U.S. attitudes to renewable fuels, visit the Renewable Fuels Association Web site at: www.ethanolRFA.org.

Source: Renewable Fuels Now
Follow The Rules When Planting Transgenic Corn
As the number of Ohio growers planting transgenic corn hybrids increases, Ohio State University Extension entomologists are reiterating the importance of following required insect resistant management (IRM) guidelines.

Ron Hammond, an OSU Extension entomologist with the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, anticipates increased acres of Bt hybrids next season to help control such insects as western corn rootworm and European corn borer. But such hybrids need to be carefully managed with non-transgenic areas.

"Knowing that Ohio growers will, in all likelihood, plant more Bt corn hybrids next spring, we continue to remind growers about IRM requirements," says Hammond. "The purpose of employing these practices is to help prevent insects from developing resistance to the Bt gene."

The IRM requirements are "government regulations that must be followed," adds Hammond. "Growers who fail to follow IRM requirements risk losing access to corn biotechnology."

Transgenics is the science of introducing a gene from one organism or plant into the genome of another organism or plant. In crop production, Bt corn to control European corn borer and rootworm, and Roundup Ready corn and soybeans for enhanced weed control would be examples of transgenics.

The most important requirement when using Bt corn hybrids is to plant a 20% refuge of non-transgenic corn. "A refuge is simply a block or strip of corn planted with a hybrid that does not have the Bt gene. The primary purpose is to maintain a pest population that is not exposed to the Bt toxin, allowing susceptible insects to remain within the population and mate with any resistant insects that survive in the transgenic area," says Hammond. "This allows any offspring to remain susceptible to the Bt hybrid."

When managing the refuge, growers are urged to adhere to the following guidelines: In terms of distance of the refuge from the Bt corn for corn borer, the non-Bt refuge can be within, adjacent or near the Bt field, but it has to be within a half mile -- preferably within a quarter mile. For corn rootworm, the non-Bt refuge has to be within the same field as the Bt corn, or adjacent to it.

There are several planting options, including a separate field refuge mainly used to control corn borer; an adjacent field; a separate, but adjacent block next to the Bt corn; a block refuge within the Bt field; a refuge planted along the perimeter; or a split-planter refuge. "If planting the refuge using a split planter, the strip width must be at least four rows, preferably six rows," says Hammond.

Both transgenic and non-transgenic areas should be managed in a similar manner. Growers should plant both hybrid types close to or at the same time, and select Bt and non-Bt hybrids that have similar growth and development characteristics. "If planting a refuge for corn rootworm, for example, the cropping history must be the same. That is, if Bt corn is planted following corn, then the refuge must be planted following corn," says Hammond.

When using insecticides, there are procedures for controlling the target insect and secondary insects. When controlling for European corn borer, the non-Bt corn refuge may be treated with conventional insecticides only if the target pest reaches economic threshold. "A foliar Bt-based insecticide cannot be used within the refuge," says Hammond. When controlling for western corn rootworm, a soil-, seed- or foliar-applied insecticide is allowed for the refuge. If an aerial insecticide is applied to the refuge for control of rootworm adults, the same treatment must be applied at the same time to Bt corn.

If a refuge is planted in a rotated field, the Bt field must also be planted on rotated ground. However, if the refuge is corn following corn, the Bt field can be planted on either a continuous or rotated field.

Guidelines also exist when planting a hybrid with stacked traits that contain both Bt types. "Growers have two management approaches. The first choice is to plant separate refuges for each target pest," says Hammond. "We recommend the second choice -- the common refuge approach where corn without any Bt technology is planted. In this case, a 20% refuge must be planted within or adjacent to the transgenic field."

Hammond said that growers should consult their seed dealers for information regarding proper management for transgenic corn hybrids, or for any additional IRM requirements related to single and stacked-trait corn hybrids.

Source: Ohio State University Extension
Renewable Energy Conference Focuses On Southern Ohio Opportunities
Learn about renewable energy options for southern Ohio, including grain-based ethanol, biodiesel, cellulosic ethanol and woody biomass, at the Southern Ohio Renewable Energy Conference Nov. 14.

The conference will be held from 9:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. at the Comfort Inn in Piketon, OH. Registration is $20 and includes lunch and conference materials.

For more information or to register, contact John Hemmings at (800) 223-7491, (740) 947-2853, ext. 16, or jhemmings@ovrdc.org, or log on to www.ovrdc.org.

Source: Ohio State University
Risk Management Course Offered For Women In Agriculture
The Cooperative Extension Service program, popular across the Midwest, was held in Ohio for the first time last year in Wood and Delaware counties. This year, the program is expanding and will be offered in Ashland, Ashtabula, Auglaize, Defiance, Erie and Wood counties.

Annie's Project, launched in 2003 by University of Illinois Extension educator Ruth Hambleton, in honor of her mother, Annie, and her commitment to the family farm, is designed to empower farm women to be better business partners through networks and by managing and organizing critical information and increasing communication skills.

"Annie's Project brings women together to learn the financial skills and critical information needed to manage the complicated business of running a farm," says Julia Nolan Woodruff, an Ohio State University Extension educator for Ashland County. Specific topics include financial record keeping, understanding basic financial statements, financial management tools, goal setting and mission statement writing, commodity marketing basics, crop insurance, family communication, retirement planning and learning about individual personality types and characteristics through the Real Colors program.

The class meets one evening a week for six consecutive weeks. The registration fee is $60 and class space is limited.

For registration information contact the host county or project coordinators: Doris Herringshaw at (419) 354-9050 and Julia Woodruff at (419) 281-8242, or log on to ohioagmanager.osu.edu and follow the link for the November newsletter.

Since 2003, over 2,000 farm women in nine states have completed the six-week course.

Source: Ohio State University

Off The Cob
Golf Goes 'Green' With New Natural-Derived Fertilizer
Some communities have requested and even mandated that golf courses utilize natural fertilizers in order to minimize the possibility of a downstream threat to surface and groundwater. Currently used fertilizers are made from urea, ammonium sulfate or ammonium nitrate. "These are synthesized from natural gas and each is acidifying in nature and can impact the soil pH with overuse," says University of Illinois (U of I) researcher Tom Fermanian.

"The fertilizers available to golf course managers have similar properties," says Fermanian. To develop a natural fertilizer with a higher nitrogen (N) content, the U of I worked with Archer Daniels Midland Company (ADM) to test a series of natural-derived fertilizer products. The result of the testing is a line of products marketed under the name NaturStim. They contain lysine, a bio-product from fermented corn.

"One advantage of these lysine-based products is that they dissolve quickly in water and can be mixed with other turf products that are normally applied as a spray," says Fermanian. "Lysine in its granular form is 15% N and soluble in water so it is quickly available for turf use, similar to most synthetic fertilizers."

In the study, ammonium sulfate (the current fertilizer industry standard used by most golf courses) as well as two forms of lysine were dissolved in water and applied in a liquid spray. Sustane, a natural fertilizer product, and the NaturStim L-Soy 9 materials were applied dry as granules. The three newly formulated NaturStim fertilizers made from lysine were rated as well as the ammonium sulfate and Sustane controls applied at the same rate.

"Research shows that the NaturStim products perform as well as synthetic fertilizers, but have the added benefit of providing golf course managers with a more natural alternative to traditional fertilizers," says Fermanian.

ADM intends to have NaturStim available for residential use, as well as commercial applications. Fermanian said that long-term studies are needed to observe any additional positive effects with the routine use of lysine as a fertilizer.

Source: University of Illinois
U of I Students Take Robotic Harvesting System On The Road
Automated harvesting is considered science fantasy by some farmers, but students at the University of Illinois have developed a small-scale harvesting model that could help bring fantasy one step closer to reality.

Students in the Off-Road Equipment Management class in the department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering (ABE) have developed an autonomous harvester-to-bin system that uses wireless communication to synchronize the action between a harvester and an unloader. The team recently took their project to the robotics demonstration at the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International Meeting in Minneapolis, MN.

"The challenge was to design an automated harvesting operation that used one harvester and one or more unloading carts," says Tony Grift, a professor in ABE who teaches the equipment management class. "An autonomously guided harvester sends wireless messages to an unloader to indicate that its bin is full. The task of the unloader is then to engage the harvester and return to a location where it dumps its loads into a pit. Then the process starts again and the goal is to move as much simulated grain as possible from the harvester to the pit in a five-minute time period."

The size of the bin had to be one liter, and green BBs were used to simulate grain. Students were allowed to fill the bin manually after each cycle.

"It's great when students build something that can eventually be used for research," Grift concludes. "We want to do something that is very close to the real problems we're trying to solve here."

Source: University of Illinois

The Ear-Tip Extra
Payoff From Polymer Seed Coats: A Note From The Corn E-Digest Editor
If you've had experience using polymer seed coats on corn seed and would like to share the pros and cons of doing so, please let me know who you are, where you farm and what problems or successes you might have had.

I'd like to hear from farmers, researchers and industry sources on the topic. Also, please let me know if you have any other ideas on what you'd like to see covered in a future issue of the Corn E-Digest, or if you have concerns or questions about this issue, please write me (John Pocock) at: jpocock@csdigest.com.


ABOUT THIS NEWSLETTER
You are subscribed to this newsletter as #email#

To unsubscribe from this newsletter go to: Unsubscribe

To subscribe to this newsletter, go to: Subscribe

More About this Newsletter
To get this newsletter in a different format (Text or HTML), or to change your e-mail address, please visit your profile page to change your delivery preferences.

For questions concerning delivery of this newsletter, please contact our Customer Service Department at:
Customer Service Department
Corn and Soybean Digest
A Penton Media publication
US Toll Free: 866-505-7173 International: 847-763-9504 Email:cornandsoybeandigest@pbinews.com
Penton Media | 249 W. 17th Street | New York, NY 10011

Copyright 2007, Penton Media. All rights reserved. This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be reproduced, rewritten, distributed, re-disseminated, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast, directly or indirectly, in any medium without the prior written permission of Penton Media.