View this email as a Web page Please add SO_Soybean e-Digest_ to your Safe Sender list.
Soy E-Digest
 BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE PUBLISHERS OF THE CORN & SOYBEAN DIGEST Subscribe Unsubscribe Preferences Contact Us 
  September 18, 2008 A Penton Media Property Volume 3, Number 4  
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Soybean Pod-fill Problems Threaten Final Yields

Strategies Available To Help Soybean Growers Reduce Harvest Losses

SCN'S Water Cruise

Make Weed Management Decisions NOW

New Study: Soybean Prices Likely To Average $11.50/bu.

ASA Gives Reasons For Record U.S. Soybean Exports

Glyphosate: The Micronutrient Minimizer?

Bean Leaf Beetle Pod Feeding On Late-Planted Soybeans

National Science Foundation Funds ISU's $2.1 Million Soybean Disease Project

Soybean Checkoff, Female-Farmer-Leaders Travel To Africa

Farm Safety Statistics Tell Strong Story

A Note From The Soybean E-Digest Editor: Credit Crunch Worries?



Top Bean News
Soybean Pod-fill Problems Threaten Final Yields
Soybean crops in key U.S. growing areas are far from faring well after a deluge of rain this past weekend, says Emerson Nafziger, University of Illinois Extension agronomist.

“I think it’s fair to say that this is not the perfect end to a perfect year for soybeans,” says Nafziger. “Any time the crop is standing in water, it’s too much rain. In the Champaign-Urbana area, we’ve now had 7½ in. of rain for the month, and after the first 3 in., there was no advantage to any more rain.”

Statewide, Illinois has received between 4 and 12 in. of rainfall in the first half of September, and some of the heaviest rains fell Saturday and Sunday, says Nafziger. To make matters worse, wet conditions this spring had already prevented many Midwestern farmers from planting soybeans early, or drowned out areas that were planted early.

“There are a lot of replanted fields this year, and if those fields or replanted areas are in standing water again, then this rain will likely do some real damage, because they’re not going to fill grain adequately,” says Nafziger. “However, ponding water won’t be as big a problem this week for soybeans that are nearly mature. It’s a much bigger problem for soybeans that were just starting or in the middle of seed fill and have more seed-filling yet to do”

Pod-fill problems are likely to cause yield reductions for a lot of soybeans in the region, however, cautions Nafziger. “When September is warm and dry, that’s normally favorable for filling pods [if rainfall has been adequate in August],” he says. “This year has been just the opposite; there’s been inadequate rainfall in August and too much in September. For good soybean pod fill to occur in September, warm and sunny is best, cool and sunny is next best, cool and rainy is third best and warm and rainy is the worst. When there is no sunshine for several days, those are not good days for the crop that’s trying to finish up pod-fill through photosynthesis.”

Last week, the USDA pegged Illinois soybeans to average 42 bu./acre, but Nafziger says that forecast may be too optimistic. “Even if we do make that 42-bu. average, it will be our lowest state average soybean yield in five years,” he says. “In Illinois, our highest soybean yields typically occur with early podding. This year, we’ve pushed the seed-fill period back quite a bit, and September is generally not as favorable a time to fill pods as August is.”

Adequate pod-fill also remains a key concern for soybean yields in Missouri, says Bill Wiebold, University of Missouri Extension agronomist. “It’s been a tough year for soybean growers here since day one,” he says. “We have a lot of late-planted soybeans that are not maturing very rapidly, and over the weekend, the state had 8-10 in. of rainfall. Low-lying areas are flooded again – some for the third time this year. So, overall, it’s not looking like a very good crop and people are disappointed.”

The USDA may have overestimated the state’s potential soybean yields this year, says Wiebold. “What we really need is a late frost this fall, but temperatures have already been as low as 38° F in the northern part of the state, and the crop is slow in developing,” he adds.

As often occurs in this state when wet conditions prevail in early spring, disease problems are starting to show up this fall. “We’re now seeing some problems with sudden death syndrome (SDS),” says Wiebold. “So, farmers need to make a note of all their fields that have SDS or other diseases now so that they can plant a variety with more resistance the next time they plant soybeans in those fields.”

A timely harvest for both corn and soybeans will be essential, emphasizes Wiebold. “I know that’s hard to do when the fields are wet, but you might have to harvest portions of fields that are dry and then go back later to harvest wet areas when they dry out,” he says. “You don’t want to put 80% of the field at risk because 20% of the field is too wet to harvest right away.”

Some Missouri farmers are already seeing some sprouting of pods in the field, and whenever there are several wet and dry weather cycles during fall, it can cause soybeans to shatter at harvest, notes Wiebold. So, he advises farmers to watch their fields closely and harvest them before either stalks or pods deteriorate enough to jeopardize yield.

For more information on the nation’s soybean crop progress, click here: usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/MannUsda.

By John Pocock

Bean Briefs
Strategies Available To Help Soybean Growers Reduce Harvest Losses
Harvest losses can significantly reduce soybean growers’ yields and profitability. Harvest losses of 12% can easily occur if combine operators don’t pay close attention to equipment adjustments and operation. Michigan State University (MSU) Extension Educator Mike Staton suggests that adopting a few harvest-management strategies can limit losses to 3% or less.

“Shatter losses at the header account for most of the harvest losses,” says Staton, who is based in Van Buren County and also coordinates the Soybean 2010 program. “The best way to prevent shatter losses is to harvest as much of your crop as possible before the moisture level in the beans falls below 13%. When soybeans undergo repeated wetting and drying cycles after initially drying below 13% moisture, the pods become brittle and shatter easily.”

In a study conducted at Pennsylvania State University by Interim Grain Specialist Del Voight, a yield loss of 20 bu./acre occurred when harvest was delayed by three weeks. Voight also measured preharvest losses of 12% due to premature shattering when harvest was delayed by three weeks in another field.

He recommends harvesting soybeans one week after 95% of the leaves turn brown, even though some green leaves may still remain on the stalks. To continue reading this article on harvest practices to help optimize soybean harvest, click here: cornandsoybeandigest.com.

Source: Michigan State University Extension
   ADVERTISEMENT
NK® Soybeans Deliver a New Level of Yield
Discover maximum yields by relying on the proven performance of NK Soybeans. In 2007, NK Soybeans outyielded the competition in 76% of Syngenta’s yield trials. NK Soybeans yielded up to 60 bu/A, twice as often as competition. Contact your Garst®, Golden Harvest® or NK® Seeds dealer.

. NK® is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company.
Garst® is a trademark of Garst Seed Company.
Golden Harvest® is a trademark of Golden Harvest Seeds, Inc.

SCN'S Water Cruise
Significant flooding in many areas of the Midwest may have done more than drown newly planted crops and hinder development –- it may have given soybean cyst nematode (SCN) the opportunity to move into new areas.

“Considering how much flooding occurred across the Midwest and the historical movement of soybean cyst nematodes, it's highly likely SCN moved into fields that previously may have tested negative,” says Shawn Conley, state soybean specialist at the University of Wisconsin.

“There's a valid concern, especially in states where SCN is not widespread,” says Greg Tylka, professor of plant pathology at Iowa State University. “Flooding occurred in many fields that may not have seen that amount of water in many years.”

Soybean cyst nematodes are very durable, and hitching a ride in moving floodwater can take a cyst or eggs many miles. “There's nothing in the whole flooding process that could hurt a nematode egg,” Tylka says. “SCN could easily survive a trip of 30 miles or more. Even at 300 miles, there's nothing about that venture that will hurt, especially if eggs are inside the cyst.”

To continue reading this article about SCN and its potential spread through flooding, click here: cornandsoybeandigest.com/soybeans.

By Mark Moore
Make Weed Management Decisions NOW
Believe it or not, now is the time to begin thinking about weed management for the 2009 growing season. And as always, the watchword is “stewardship.”

As you begin to harvest the fields, note the weeds that are present and think back to what you did last spring and summer to control the weeds. If you only sprayed glyphosate or any other single herbicide, rethink the tactic. Recurrent application of herbicides will select rapidly for weeds that do not respond to that herbicide. Consider using many different tactics to manage as many weeds as possible and reduce the selection pressure.

Also observe patterns of weeds in the fields. I have observed many fields that have oblong-shaped patches of common waterhemp. The direction always follows the tillage pattern and typically there are dead plants next to the live plants. This should scream out impending concerns about resistant populations.

To continue reading this article on fall weed management, click here: www.extension.iastate.edu.

By Micheal Owen, Iowa State University Extension
New Study: Soybean Prices Likely To Average $11.50/bu.
An ethanol-fueled spike in grain prices will likely hold, yielding the first sustained increase for corn, wheat and soybean prices in more than three decades, according to new research by two University of Illinois farm economists.

Corn, an ethanol ingredient that has driven the recent price surge, could average $4.60 a bushel in Illinois, nearly double the average $2.42/bu. from 1973 to 2006, say Darrel Good and Scott Irwin, professors of agriculture and consumer economics.

They say price swings stemming from weather or other market variables could send corn as high as $6.70/bu. or down to $3, based on a review of market data dating back to the mid-1900s for a report titled “The New Era of Corn, Soybean and Wheat Prices.”

“The extreme low prices in terms of the new era would have been considered awfully good prices in the old era,” Good says. The report also shows soybean prices could average $11.50/bu. in the new era, up sharply from an average of $6.15 from 1973 to 2006, with swings from $8.20 to $19/bu.

To read more about the report, click here: www.news.uiuc.edu/news.

Source: University of Illinois
ASA Gives Reasons For Record U.S. Soybean Exports
The American Soybean Association (ASA) pointed to its many years of farm and trade policy work and its long history of building export markets for helping U.S. soybean exports reach record levels as reported last week by the USDA’s Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS). In its year end report, USDA/FAS announced soybean exports exceeding 30.449 million metric tons (MMT), equivalent to 1.118 billion bushels, for marketing year (MY) 2007-2008, which ended Aug. 31, 2008.

China was again the largest buyer of U.S. soybeans at 490.6 million bushels. The European Union-27 was second with 143.1 million bushels; Mexico was third with 131.3 million bushels; and Japan was fourth with 99.5 million bushels. Collectively, these four buyers represented 77% of total U.S. soybean exports during MY 2007/08.

As the policy advocate for U.S. soybean producers, the ASA has advanced soybean production and exports through market-driven farm bill legislation, trade agreements that brought down trade barriers and new biotech soybean seed introductions that did not disrupt soybean exports.

“ASA’s work on farm policy in the 1990, 1995, and subsequent farm bills provided U.S. soybean producers with the planting flexibility that allowed soybean production to expand in response to market signals,” says ASA President John Hoffman, a soybean producer from Waterloo, IA. “U.S. soybean planted acres have expanded by almost 30% in the past 18 years, from 58 million acres in 1990 to nearly 75 million acres this year, while U.S. soybean exports more than doubled from 557 million bushels in 1990 to this year’s all-time record 1.118 billion bushels.”

China, the largest importer of U.S. soybeans, purchased 17% more U.S. soybeans this year compared to last year. China’s accession to the World Trade Organization was essential to improved market access for U.S. soybeans.

To continue reading this article about reasons for record levels of U.S. exports this year, click here: www.soygrowers.com/newsroom.

Source: The American Soybean Association
Glyphosate: The Micronutrient Minimizer?
Manganese deficiency in soybeans appears to be a growing issue in areas with high-pH soils (6.5 and up) and/or higher organic matter content and where glyphosate-resistant soybean varieties have been planted. Deficiencies have been reported in Indiana, Michigan, Kansas and Wisconsin.

One of the most limiting factors to high yield in glyphosate-resistant soybeans is a suspected micronutrient deficiency resulting from applications of glyphosate to soil, weeds and to glyphosate-resistant soybeans, report Shawn Conley and Carrie Laboski, soil specialists, University of Wisconsin (UW). They are conducting a study after numerous inquires about the issue last year.

“It's important to know that their research applies most appropriately to soils that have borderline or deficient levels of manganese (Mn),” writes George Rehm, University of Minnesota nutrient specialist, retired. “This issue is not one we can paint with a broad brush. It's important to understand that soils differ greatly across the Corn Belt. It is difficult to take data from one state and transfer it to another.

“The response to Mn in Indiana might be expected because soils in the northwest and northeast part of that state have low Mn levels,” Rehm says. “In Kansas, the responses were reported in production environments with yields of roughly 70 bu./acre.”

Rehm did not find a response to Mn among glyphosate-resistant soybeans in Minnesota. The UW researchers will post preliminary soil and leaf tissue test data from this year's large-scale field experiments on Conley's Web site (www.coolbean.info) this fall. This is the first year of a two- to three-year study funded by the Wisconsin Soybean Marketing Board.

To continue reading this article about the potential response to Mn among glyphosate-resistant soybeans, click here: cornandsoybeandigest.com/soybeans.

By Lynn Grooms
Bean Leaf Beetle Pod Feeding On Late-Planted Soybeans
Soybeans grown for seed, especially late-planted or late-maturing beans, should be monitored for bean leaf beetle damage as leaves begin to yellow and pods remain green, advise Purdue University entomologists.

Bean leaf beetles scar the surface of pods, but only occasionally feed through the pod to the developing beans, explain John Obermeyer, Purdue Extension integrated pest management supervisor, and Larry Bledsoe, Purdue Extension pest management expert. During pod maturation, this scar often cracks leaving an entry hole for airborne plant pathogens that may cause discolored, moldy, shriveled or diseased beans that show no outward signs of the pathogen.

Bledsoe says it’s important for pest managers to be able to predict whether economic damage will occur based on the types and numbers of beetles that are present and the stage of pod development (i.e., green, yellow, yellow-brown or brown pods). Once the pods turn yellow to yellow-brown, they become less attractive and less susceptible to damage. Control is normally not warranted from this point on.

Obermeyer and Bledsoe recommend randomly selecting two plants from five different areas of the field and then counting the number of pods per plant and the number that show damage. Calculate the percentage of damaged pods per plant for the field as a whole. Note if the pods are green, beginning to turn yellow or are yellow/brown. Also determine the number of beetles per sweep using an insect sweep net. Take five sets of 20 sweeps in the field. Determine the number of bean leaf beetles per sweep. Additionally, note whether beetles are still actively feeding while surveying the field, they advise.

There has been considerable interest in bean leaf beetle and its association with bean pod mottle virus (BPMV). Bean leaf beetle is one of the major beetle-vectors of this disease. They spread the virus by feeding on infected plants, ingesting the virus with plant tissue, and then regurgitating gut content after moving to and feeding on an uninfected plant. BPMV symptoms at harvest include green stem and hilum bleeding. Treatment for bean leaf beetle to reduce bean pod mottle virus this time of the year is not recommended, as most disease transmission occurs very early in the season.

For more information on bean leaf beetles, click on this Purdue PDF file: extension.entm.purdue.edu.

Source: Purdue University Extension
National Science Foundation Funds ISU's $2.1 Million Soybean Disease Project
Identifying genes essential for the soybean plant's defense against three major diseases will be the aim of a new $2.1 million research project led by Iowa State University.

“We expect that information resulting from the research will help improve soybean cultivars for disease resistance by accelerating plant breeding programs and by enabling the engineering of new disease resistance traits,” says Steve Whitham, associate professor of plant pathology. Whitham leads the four-year project that earned the $2.1 million National Science Foundation grant.

The research grant is important for the state of Iowa, which leads the nation in soybean production. Nationally, soybean yield losses linked to diseases are estimated to cost farmers more than 400 million bushels every year. Even though soybean is the nation's second most economically important crop (behind corn), scientists know little about specific genes in charge of defending the soybean plant against diseases.

The ISU project will focus on genetic resistance against three important soybean pathogens: soybean mosaic virus, Asian soybean rust and soybean cyst nematode.

For more information on the ISU’s soybean disease research project, click here: www.ag.iastate.edu/aginfo/news_detail.php?var1=677.

Source: Iowa State University

Off The Stem
Soybean Checkoff, Female-Farmer-Leaders Travel To Africa
Seven female farmer-leaders of the United Soybean Board (USB) and soybean checkoff recently took a 12-day trip to Africa on a mission to build relationships with African women who are agricultural leaders in their countries. The group consisted of six USB directors and one female director who sits on the American Soybean Association (ASA) board. This “Women in Soy” trip is part of the soybean checkoff’s effort to grow demand for soy and create new markets for U.S. soybean farmers in continents such as Africa, which is a new area of interest for checkoff international marketing efforts.

“Connecting with African women is important for U.S. soybean farmers,” says Sharon Covert, a soybean farmer from Tiskilwa, IL, who was one of the USB directors on the trip. “Nearly all of the households in Africa are run by women, and women are involved with 80% of agriculture in the continent. This makes reaching out to African women important as a way to establish relationships with the continent’s soybean industry and grow demand for soybeans in the continent.”

In the past, Africa has not been a strong focus for checkoff international marketing efforts as other regions such as China and Mexico have traditionally had stronger import markets for U.S. soybeans. This mission sends a message to agricultural leaders in Africa that U.S. soybean farmers are interested in working to build demand in Africa and recognize the region as an important player in global soybean production.

For more information about the USB and its female leader trip to Africa, click here: www.unitedsoybean.org.

Source: United Soybean Board

Soy Pod Extra
Farm Safety Statistics Tell Strong Story
Numbers always tell a story. For agriculture, the story line contains some harsh statistics:
  • In 2007, 715 deaths and 80,000 disabling injuries were attributed to agriculture.
  • The 2006 death rate for farmers and farm employees was 28 in 100,000, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
  • The 2006 injury rate for farmers and farm employees was 6 in 100.
As agriculture continues to be one of the most dangerous occupations in the world, the National Safety Council annually shines a spotlight on farming and ranching during National Farm Safety and Health Week, Sept. 21-27, 2008. This year’s theme is “Farm Safely – Protect YOUr Investment.”

Agriculture’s death rate ranks first among all occupations, according to the U.S. Department of Labor. Mining ranks second with 27 work deaths/100,000 employees and construction is third with 10 deaths/100,000 workers.

“The Farm Safety Week theme emphasizes the value of safety and wellness to all agricultural producers,” says John Slocombe, Extension farm safety specialist at Kansas State University (KSU). “We want to remind farmers of the need to be safe and stress the importance of protecting hearing, lung function, vision, skin and the musculo-skeletal system.”

Workplace injuries are expensive and inconvenient. For farmers it is estimated that four work days are lost for every injury. Meanwhile, the daily chores of feeding and caring for livestock, and planting, tending and harvesting crops continue.

Slocombe notes that up to 60% of farm injuries occur when working with livestock. Most other injuries happen during crop production with machinery incidents accounting for most injuries.

Most farmer deaths involve tractors. The overwhelming majority of injuries occur among workers aged 45 and older. The average age of U.S. farmers is 56.

According to the National Institute for Farm Safety, there is a bright spot: the number of agricultural deaths and injuries has fallen gradually during the last four years. That decline is attributed to safer equipment and increased safety awareness, says Slocombe.

For more information on farm safety from KSU, click here: www.oznet.ksu.edu/news.

Source: K-State Research & Extension News
A Note From The Soybean E-Digest Editor: Credit Crunch Worries?
With major U.S. financial institutions faltering in recent weeks and months, you may have concerns over your own sources for agricultural credit. If so, click on this link and read an article by Paul Ellinger , department of agricultural and consumer economics, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign: www.farmdoc.uiuc.edu/announcements.

If you’ve seen a change in willingness from your local banks or ag credit suppliers to work with you or have tips on how best to obtain credit when you need it for next season’s ag supplies, I’d like to hear from you.

When writing, please let me know your name, where you farm or work, what your comment is and whether or not I have permission to use your comment in a future Soybean E-Digest newsletter. You can contact me (John Pocock) at: john.pocock@penton.com.


ABOUT THIS NEWSLETTER
You are subscribed to this newsletter as #email#

To unsubscribe from this newsletter go to: Unsubscribe

To subscribe to this newsletter, go to: Subscribe

More About this Newsletter
To get this newsletter in a different format (Text or HTML), or to change your e-mail address, please visit your profile page to change your delivery preferences.

For questions concerning delivery of this newsletter, please contact our Customer Service Department at:
Customer Service Department
Corn & Soybean Digest
A Penton Media publication
US Toll Free: 866-505-7173 International: 847-763-9504 Email:cornandsoybeandigest@pbinews.com

Penton Media | 249 W. 17th Street | New York, NY 10011

Copyright 2008, Penton Media. All rights reserved. This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be reproduced, rewritten, distributed, re-disseminated, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast, directly or indirectly, in any medium without the prior written permission of Penton Media.