| View this email as a Web page | Please add HC_HomeCare Monday_ to your Safe Sender list. |
|
|
| A Penton Media Property | |
| April 27, 2009 | Volume 15, Number 18 |
|
ADVERTISEMENT
|
|
|
ADVERTISEMENT VGM Insurance is your Medicare Bond Expert and is committed to providing: • A simple, 15-minute online process - Minimal amount of information required • Bonds priced below market rate - Extremely competitive prices and several opportunities to receive discounts • Partnerships with Treasury-listed companies Bond Hotline 1-866-497-047 Table of Contents - Former Winners Working to Stop Competitive Bidding - Florida Providers Battle Medicaid Consumables Bid - Get Oxygen Reform to the Hill, Proponents Say - AAHomecare: Consider 13-Point Fraud Prevention Plan--Please! - OIG Scrutinizes S. Florida Inhalation Drug Spending - Invacare Earnings Up in Q1 - Lincare Hit Hard by Medicare Cuts - MED, ROHO Launch Support Surfaces Referral Network - Are You Ready for the Red Flags Rule? - NAS Looks at K0823 Claims; Military EMR System Will Serve as Model - On the HME Calendar For more industry news, features and highlights from our latest issue, please visit our Web site at www.homecaremag.com. Headline News Former Winners Working to Stop Competitive Bidding ATLANTA--HME providers who won contracts in the aborted Round One of DMEPOS competitive bidding last year plan to campaign against the newest attempt to implement the program, they told HomeCare Monday last week. “From Blackburn’s point of view, we are working on parallel tracks. We are working with [the American Association for Homecare] on how we can combat competitive bidding and defeat it, and on the other track … what changes would have to be made to the current methodology to make it a workable program,” said Georgie Blackburn, who oversees government relations for the Tarentum, Pa.-based company. “Blackburn’s, as a provider, will definitely be rebidding. But we are hoping to get this stopped before it gets to there,” she added. Chris Rice of Diamond Respiratory Care in Riverside, Calif., said he hopes competitive bidding will either be delayed or dropped completely. Even though the second go-round has been implemented, he said, “I still think there are avenues that we could take to delay it.” Rice, who launched a Web site, competingbid.com, to fight the program last year, said he would likely revitalize the site. “I haven’t done much with the site [since competitive bidding was delayed], but we’re still averaging 40,000 to 50,000 hits a month. It’s still a hot topic,” he said. When Congress delayed the bidding project for 18 months, legislators directed CMS to fix its problems. But CMS reprised competitive bidding in an interim final rule that requires a rebid of Round One in 2009. “They really didn’t change much of anything,” Rice pointed out. That angered stakeholders and legislators alike, and both groups responded to HHS and CMS delineating the issues with the IFR and calling for its delay at least until the Obama administration’s new leadership could study the rule. In an April 15 letter, Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, ranking member of the powerful Senate Finance Committee, threw his support behind the request. In the letter, addressed to Health and Human Services Acting Director Charles Johnson, Grassley said he was concerned "that the agency plans to move ahead without engaging in a thoughtful and deliberative process to resolve ongoing concerns about the implementation of the competitive bidding program." In all, more than 100 legislators from both parties and houses of
Congress asked for the program’s delay. But CMS refused, and the
bidding rule went into effect April 18.
The American Association for Homecare has formed a task force to discuss options for getting adjustments to the program or coming up with an alternative. The association also has hired a Washington health care consulting firm to figure out what the cost of eliminating the bidding program would be. (See "IFR Clears Way for Round One Do-Over," April 20.) “As it is right now, it is unacceptable,” Blackburn said about the IFR. “We as an industry have to do something about it. Our personal goal at Blackburn’s is to stop competitive bidding.” How do you feel about President Obama’s plan/budget for health care reform? To vote in HomeCare's monthly Web poll, visit www.homecaremag.com. Florida Providers Battle Medicaid Consumables Bid TALLAHASSEE, Fla.--Florida providers are scrambling to quash an effort that would establish a competitive bidding program for the state’s Medicaid consumables program. A bill to be voted on this week would mandate a competitive bidding program for all incontinence and medical consumables by December. Providers say such a move would decrease beneficiaries’ access to quality health care and raise costs. According to Sean Schwinghammer, acting director of the Florida Alliance of Home Care Services, language was “snuck into appropriations bills” in both of the state's legislative chambers that authorized the Agency for Health Care Administration (Florida's Medcaid agency) to create a competitive bidding program for Medicaid waivers and all consumable medical supplies. “Each appropriations bill was over 380 pages, and this was just a six-line paragraph in each that was put in, so it’s hard to find,” Schwinghammer said. He added that the provision was inserted on the Thursday before Easter “when everybody was on the way out of town.” Representatives of the recently formed association flew to Tallahassee to fight the measure last week. “FAHCS representatives have made great strides engaging elected officials and policymakers, but the Senate appropriations bill was approved and the House bill will be approved shortly,” the association said in a Friday update. “The effort is now concentrated on having the item removed in conference committee.” The conference committee is scheduled to begin considering the appropriations bill today. “Medicaid waivers are a big deal in our state,” said Schwinghammer, “so consolidating them to one or two companies is really scary. The way it has happened is not what good government is about, and we’re trying to get it fixed.” According to the FACHS update, there could also be a bill in the works to competitively bid for a single-source provider for all of the state’s HME needs. Stopping both bidding proposals is paramount, the update said: "No matter the subject matter, competitive bidding in health care is a bad idea. It destroys patient service, closes the doors of small business and creates high health care cost due to increased hospitalizations." Get Oxygen Reform to the Hill, Proponents Say ATLANTA--A Medicare oxygen reform plan has the potential to help the industry, but the time to move forward is now, the former chairman of the American Association for Homecare said last week. “At the end of the day, I think it is going to be very good for the industry. But we need to move forward and find some champions on Capitol Hill,” said Tom Ryan, president and CEO of Homecare Concepts in Farmingdale, N.Y., and immediate past chairman of AAHomecare. Crafted by the New Oxygen Coalition, the benefit reform plan would eliminate the 36-month oxygen cap, remove oxygen from competitive bidding and recognize the services home oxygen providers render. But some providers have balked at a provision in the plan that would change status from oxygen “supplier” to “provider” and at its measures on cost reporting. (See “Oxygen Reform Plan Moves Ahead with 'Provider' Change Intact,” April 13.) Ryan said he knows controversy still swirls around the plan. However, he said, “We are in a level of threat. I don’t think we should be led to believe that we are out of the woods.” He said there is still talk in Washington of cutting the 36-month cap to 18 or 13 months, and noted another potential cut if competitive bidding moves forward under CMS’ interim final rule. Alyce Crossman of UpState Home Care in Clinton, N.Y., and president
of the New York Medical Equipment Providers association, echoed Ryan.
AAHomecare: Consider 13-Point Fraud Prevention Plan--Please! WASHINGTON--Last week at a Senate subcommittee hearing on Medicare and Medicaid fraud, AAHomecare submitted a statement for the record outlining its 13-point plan to stop fraud. But during the Wednesday hearing, an association update said, the DMEPOS competitive bidding program “was discussed as if it were an anti-fraud tool and a panacea for Medicare reform.” A CMS official presented the following testimony at the hearing, which was conducted by the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Subcommittee on Federal Financial Management, Government Information, Federal Services and International Security: “Until DME competitive bidding is fully operational, CMS is pursuing a ‘stop-gap program’ to focus on Medicare fraud in seven high-risk areas across the country where CMS is increasing our oversight of the highest paid DMEPOS suppliers and the highest billed DMEPOS equipment and supplies. “The ‘stop-gap program’ increases pre-payment reviews of medical equipment suppliers and will also single out the highest-billed claims--continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) devices, oxygen equipment, glucose monitors and test strips and power wheelchairs … The plan toughens the background checks on new suppliers and increases scrutiny on the highest ordering physicians and the highest utilizing beneficiaries.” AAHomecare unveiled its 13-point plan to reduce fraud last fall, but in the midst of the election, “it didn’t resonate the way it should,” President Tyler Wilson said later. So the association held a press briefing and presented the plan to Congress again in February. Among its provisions, the plan mandates site inspections and requires a six-month trial period for new providers. The anti-fraud plan also calls for stiffer quality standards, increased penalties for fraud and real-time claims analysis to identify skewed billing patterns more quickly. (See “One More Time: AAHomecare Rolls Out Anti-Fraud Plan,” Feb. 11.) Wilson told reporters the association's action plan “is a proactive solution that will be far more effective than unnecessary Medicare cuts to the home medical equipment sector that only harm patients and seniors.” In its statement to the subcommittee last week, the association said the plan “is a tangible demonstration of the home medical equipment sector’s commitment to stopping fraud and abuse in the home care sector. More importantly, the plan will ensure that bad actors will no longer manage to enter the system, and those that are unfortunately already in are quickly discovered, removed and harshly punished.” OIG Scrutinizes S. Florida Inhalation Drug Spending WASHINGTON--While only 2 percent of Medicare beneficiaries live in South Florida, the area accounted for 17 percent of Medicare's total spending for inhalation drugs in 2007, according to an HHS Office of Inspector General report. Released Tuesday, the report--“Aberrant Claim Patterns for Inhalation Drugs in South Florida”--said Medicare spent an average of five times more per beneficiary on inhalation drugs in South Florida compared to the rest of the country, with the greatest spending differences attributable to levalbuterol and budesonide. In addition, the OIG said beneficiaries listed on 62
percent of the area's inhalation drug claims did not have an office
visit with the prescribing physicians in the previous three years.
Three-quarters of the beneficiaries receiving budesonide also frequently
exceeded coverage guidelines set in the local coverage determination for
a 90-day period.
Among paid inhalation drug claims, the report said Medicare spent
$4,400 per South Florida beneficiary compared with $815 in the rest of
the country. In Miami-Dade County in 2007, Medicare paid $143 million
for inhalation drugs, 20 times more than the amount paid in Cook County
(Chicago), Ill., the county with the next-highest total payments. But
the report noted twice as many beneficiaries live in Cook County as
Miami-Dade.
Frizerra described the efforts by CMS' Miami and Los Angeles field offices to identify suppliers whose beneficiaries had no clinical relationship with the physicians listed on DME claims, and to revoke the Medicare billing numbers for suppliers not meeting supplier standards. Invacare Earnings Up in Q1 ELYRIA, Ohio--Invacare Corp. reported Thursday that first-quarter earnings were up compared with a year ago despite a decline in sales. Net income for the giant manufacturer rose 8.5 percent for the quarter to $2.4 million, or 8 cents a share, from $2.2 million, or 7 cents a share, in the same period for 2008. Earnings were positively impacted by organic sales growth, cost reductions, lower interest expenses and a lower tax rate. Net sales decreased 4.4 percent to $398 million versus $416.3 million in 2008, with a negative impact from foreign currency translation. In the company’s North America/HME division, net sales for the quarter increased 6.2 percent to $186.7 million compared to $175.8 million last year. Rehab product net sales increased by 2.6 percent, and standard product net sales increased 11.1 percent compared to the first quarter of last year, driven by increased volumes in manual wheelchairs, patient aids and beds. Respiratory product net sales spiked 14.3 percent on volume increases in oxygen concentrators and strong purchases by national accounts, according to the company. Looking ahead, organic sales growth for the year is expected to be 4 to 6 percent, excluding any impact from acquisitions and foreign currency adjustments. Commenting on the results, Invacare Chairman and CEO Mal Mixon said the economy has not hurt performance. “Health care is probably the most insulated industry from this economic crisis we’re in. Our products are strong,” he said. Neither has the company seen an effect from the 9.5 percent DME reimbursement cut that took effect in January. “There’s still a lot of profitability in this industry,” Mixon said. But the outcome of industry struggles with competitive bidding and the 36-month oxygen cap remain to be seen. “We are optimistic there could be some major changes made to the rules on competitive bidding,” Mixon said. “As to whether the program could be eliminated entirely, that appears less likely.” As for the oxygen cap, while large public companies had been preparing for the scenario, “a lot of smaller companies didn’t read the fine print and some of them didn’t realize it was going to hit when it hit,” he said, noting those providers may not feel the full impact of the cap or the 9.5 percent cut until the second quarter. “They are still collecting money from rents and sales they made in October, November and December,” Mixon said. “I think we’re going to see a lot of talk on oxygen reform,” he continued. “The 36 months doesn’t make any sense from a medical point of view … Many patients go five to seven years needing oxygen, so it doesn’t make sense to me that a provider should have to continue providing all this capability at an arbitrary number of payments.” While there could be more influence from reimbursement changes as the year progresses, Mixon said he expects a strong performance from the NA/HME division for the year. “Our products are very basic. If you have a spinal injury, you need a wheelchair,” he said. “Revenue sources for our customers are much more dependable and substantial than most industries in general,” Mixon continued. “Our customers don’t have to worry unless we think our government is going to go bankrupt.” Lincare Hit Hard by Medicare Cuts CLEARWATER, Fla.--Last week Lincare Holdings reported net revenues for the quarter ended March 31 of $371.7 million, down 10.5 percent from $415.4 million for the first quarter of 2008. Net income for the quarter was $26 million, or 36 cents a share, compared to net income of $58.2 million, or 76 cents a share, a year earlier. The results were impacted by “dramatic reductions” in Medicare reimbursements, a company release said, citing the 9.5 percent cut on certain DME and the 36-month cap on oxygen that took effect Jan. 1. The release also noted lower ASP (average sales price) reimbursements for respiratory medicines, primarily albuterol. Drug reimbursements for the 2009 quarter were $22 million less than in the same period last year. Lincare did not alter its estimate of the full-year impact of the Medicare changes, which it said in February would be $240 to $255 million (see “Lincare Predicts Rough 2009,” Feb. 23). The company serves more than 700,000 customers in 48 states through 1,056 locations. “The Medicare changes effective as of January 1 of this year have had an enormous impact on our business,” John Byrnes, Lincare CEO, said in the release. “We are confident that we are uniquely positioned to gain market share in our core respiratory business as our competitors struggle to deal with the severe financial consequences of the Medicare cuts.” MED, ROHO Launch Support Surfaces Referral Network LUBBOCK, Texas; BELLEVILLE, Ill.--The MED Group and The ROHO Group have partnered on a service that will let clinicians prescribe ROHO’s therapeutic support surfaces and cushions for their patients with orders to be filled through MED’s national HME provider network. Through centralized dispatch, the ROHO National Referral Fulfillment Network allows a discharge planner, case manager or other health care provider to order the company’s products for patients as they are discharged. “A discharge planner can work with the local ROHO representative so that she knows exactly what type of products will work best for her patients,” said Rhonda Hines, MED’s director of referral management, in a release. “And, with a dedicated referral network solution in place, she can be assured that the products she has chosen are the products that will be placed by a highly qualified, accredited provider.” The process will use MED’s Web–enabled GoMEDEdge, which places referrals with providers in the network. "The winners will ultimately be the end-use clients, who will now have more high quality choices to address their seating and support surfaces needs," said ROHO's Tom Borcherding, executive vice president of global sales. MED Group has more than 370 providers representing more than 1,200 locations. Are You Ready for the Red Flags Rule? ATLANTA--Just when you thought you had all the newest rules and regulations under control, it's time to make sure you're ready for the FTC’s “Red Flags Rule” on identity theft. The full text of the rule, which includes guidelines for developing an identity theft program (beginning on page 63773), is available at www.ftc.gov/os/fedreg/2007/november/071109redflags.pdf. To gain a better understanding of its legal requirements, HomeCare asked health care attorney Jeff Baird, chairman of the Health Care Group at Brown & Fortunato, to explain the Red Flags Rule. His Q&A on the basics of the rule, which has a compliance date of May 1, follows: Q: What is the Red Flags Rule? A: The Red Flags Rule is a set of regulatory provisions regarding the prevention and mitigation of identity theft, including medical identity theft. Section 114 of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003 amended the Fair Credit Reporting Act of 1970 to require federal bank regulatory agencies, the National Credit Union Administration and the Federal Trade Commission to jointly develop rules and guidelines regarding identity theft. The final Red Flags Rule was published Nov. 9, 2007, and initially required a compliance date of Nov. 1, 2008. The compliance date was subsequently delayed to May 1, 2009. This means that the Red Flags Rule is effective right now. Q: Is the Red Flags Rule applicable to HME suppliers? A: Yes, the Red Flags Rule applies to most, if not all, HME suppliers. The Red Flags Rule applies to “financial institutions” and “creditors” that maintain “covered accounts.” The American Medical Association argued that a health care provider is not a “creditor” under the rule. However, the FTC considers a creditor to be any entity that regularly defers payment for goods and services. In other words, a health care provider that bills patients after services are rendered or that bills third-party payers for services rendered to patients is a creditor under the rule. A health care provider that requires payment before or at the time of service is not a creditor.
A “covered account” is a consumer account that allows multiple
payments or transactions, or has a reasonably foreseeable risk of
identity theft. The FTC takes the position that patient accounts are
generally covered accounts under the rule.
First, the program must have policies and procedures to identify red flags during the day-to-day operation of the business. Red flags are suspicious patterns or practices, or specific activities that indicate the possibility of identity theft. For example, if the patient must show some form of identification during intake, then an identification card that looks fake would be a red flag. Second, the program must have policies and procedures to detect the red flags that have been identified. Continuing the above example, if a fake ID is a red flag, then the program must have policies and procedures in place to detect fake IDs. Third, the program must specify the steps the HME supplier will take when a red flag is detected. The steps should be designed to prevent and mitigate any harm from the detected red flag. In our example, the program would need to specify what actions the HME supplier will take when it determines that a patient has presented fake ID to law enforcement. Finally, the program must specify how the HME supplier will re-evaluate the program to address new or changing risks of identity theft. For example, the program may specify that it is reviewed and updated annually, and reviewed at any time if the supplier is made aware of a new risk (such as a new method) of identity theft. The initial program must be approved by the HME supplier’s board of directors (or a committee of the board), or, if the supplier does not have a board, a senior-level employee. Either the board of directors or a designated employee (at the level of senior management) must be involved in the oversight, development, implementation and administration of the program. The program must provide for training
to staff as necessary. If the HME supplier has subcontractors to perform
parts of its operation that would be covered by the Red Flags Rule, such
as billing, then the program must include policies and procedures for
monitoring the subcontractor’s compliance with the program and the Red
Flags Rule. The Red Flags Rule includes an appendix that contains
guidelines for developing and administering the program.
• Suspicious documents. Has a new patient given you identification
documents that look altered or forged? Is the photograph or physical
description on the ID inconsistent with what the patient looks like? Did
the patient give you other documentation inconsistent with what he or
she has told you--for example, an inconsistent date of birth or a
chronic medical condition not mentioned elsewhere? Under the Red Flags
Rule, you may need to ask for additional information from that patient.
In
addition, for HME suppliers enrolled in Medicare, a violation of the Red
Flags Rule could also form the basis of a violation of the DMEPOS
Supplier Standards, which requires, among other things, that a supplier
operates its business and furnishes Medicare-covered items in compliance
with all applicable federal and state licensure and regulatory
requirements.
In Brief NAS Looks at K0823 Claims; Military EMR System Will Serve as Model An update from Noridian Administrative Services said the Jurisdiction D DME MAC may ask for additional documentation for HCPCS code K0823--power wheelchair, group 2 standard, captain's chair, patient weight capacity up to and including 300 pounds. NAS said it is "closely monitoring" the claims due to a high volume of errors found by the CERT (Comprehensive Error Rate Testing) contractor. If you receive a request from NAS for additional documentation on this code, you must submit the information requested within 30 days to avoid a claim denial. The six items that will be requested are: valid written order, obtained prior to delivery; detailed product description; face-to-face examination; home assessment; proof of delivery; and beneficiary authorization. Read the complete update. Military EMR System to Serve as Health Care Reform Model President Obama said Thursday the government will create a national electronic medical records system for the military that can be a model for reform of the country's health care administration. The president has emphasized EMRs as part of his health care reform plan. Set up by the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs, an electronic record would follow military personnel "from the day they first enlist to the day that they are laid to rest," Obama said. Third Time the Charm for Sebelius? BOC Suspends Footwear Specialist Certificate
NAHC Launches 'Help Us Choose Home' According to Uplift President Michael Speraw, “Our products help many people who suffer with arthritis; that’s about one in five American adults. We’re getting older and this makes support for arthritis research more important than ever to deal with a growing problem.” Speraw said last year’s challenge raised more than $10,000. Nearly 5.6 Million Americans Paralyzed
Curb Whistleblower Awards? Not in Fraud Cases, Says Senate Coming Up On the HME Calendar The Pacific Association for Medical Equipment Services (PAMES) will hold its Annual Meeting May 5-6 in Portland, Wash. For information, call 503/253-9691 or visit www.pames.org. The South Carolina Medical Equipment Services Association (SCMESA) Annual Meeting is set May 20-22 in Columbia, S.C. For information, visit www.scmesa.com. The MED Group’s Annual National Rehab Network Summit has been rescheduled for May 9-11 in Denver, Colo. For information, visit www.medgroup.com. The National Community Pharmacists Association (NCPA) Legislation and Government Affairs Conference will take place in Washington, D.C., May 11-13. For information, call 800/544-7447 or visit www.ncpanet.org. CMS has scheduled its next Home Health, Hospice and DME Open Door Forum Wednesday, May 13, from 2 p.m. to 3 p.m. ET. To participate by phone, dial 800/837-1935 and use Conference ID 94280596. The National Association of Rehabilitation Providers and Agencies' (NARA) annual Spring Legislative Conference will be held May 13-15 in Washington, D.C. For information, call 813/855-9168 or visit www.naranet.org. The American Thoracic Society’s International Conference will take place in San Diego May 15-20. For information, call 212/315-8600 or visit www.thoracic.org. The Georgia Association of Medical Equipment Services (GAMES) will hold its Spring Quarterly Meeting May 19 in Athens, Ga. For information, visit gameshme.org or call 770/578-3999. CMS has scheduled a national provider conference call on
ICD-10-CM/PCS Implementation and General Equivalence Mappings
(crosswalks) May 19 from 1 p.m. - 2:30 p.m. ET. The call will
include an overview of the final rule, available planning resources and
clarifications. Registration
is required.
To revisit this news any time during the week, go to www.homecaremonday.com. ADVERTISEMENT |
||
About this Newsletter You are subscribed to this newsletter as #email# To unsubscribe from this newsletter go to: Unsubscribe To subscribe to this newsletter, go to: Subscribe To visit HomeCare's Web site click here For information on advertising in this newsletter, please contact Kent Peterson, National Sales Manager/Western Region Sales at kpeterson@homecaremag.com, or John McNamara, Regional Sales Manager/Eastern Region Sales at jmcnamara@homecaremag.com. |
||
|
|
||
|
To get this newsletter in a different format (Text or HTML),
or to change your e-mail address, please visit your profile
page to change your delivery preferences.
For questions concerning delivery of this newsletter, please contact our
Customer Service Department at: Penton Media | 249 W. 17th Street | New York, NY 10011 Copyright 2009, Penton Media. All rights reserved. This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be reproduced, rewritten, distributed, re-disseminated, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast, directly or indirectly, in any medium without the prior written permission of Penton Media. |