| View this email as a Web page | Please add HC_HomeCare Monday_ to your Safe Sender list. |
|
|
| A Penton Media Property | |
| March 23, 2009 | Volume 15, Number 12 |
|
ADVERTISEMENT
|
|
|
ADVERTISEMENT Computers Unlimited provides fully integrated software solutions for HME, closed pharmacy and home infusion markets. TIMS software offers comprehensive claims processing, reimbursement management, denial tracking, rental equipment billing and tracking, bar code inventory control, mobile delivery, business intelligence tools, in-depth customer inquiry and document imaging for electronic patient records. Email us for more information at sales@cu.net www.cu.net Table of Contents - Providers Urge CMS to Pull Competitive Bidding IFR - It's Vegas, Baby! Medtrade Spring Opens Tomorrow - Oxygen Stakeholders Step Up Work on Benefit Overhaul - OIG Recommends Reimbursement Reduction for NPWT - Surety Bond Deadlines Firm, but Questions Remain - FAMES Regroups: Joan Cross Is New Executive Director - Florida Providers Form New State Association - NEMED Speaks Out at Vermont Health Care Summit - Health Care Reform Debate Heats Up - Bohner: Reconsider Oxygen Cap; CMS Sends Accreditation Reminder For more industry news, features and highlights from our latest issue, please visit our Web site at www.homecaremag.com. Headline News Providers Urge CMS to Pull Competitive Bidding IFR WASHINGTON--In a race to stop the competitive bidding clock, more than 600 HME stakeholders weighed in with comments on the project’s interim final rule, with most calling for CMS to rescind the rule before it takes effect April 18. The rule initially had an effective date of Feb. 17--a month before the comment period was set to end March 17. When CMS delayed the effective date for 60 days to allow the new administration time for review, it left the comment deadline intact. Under the IFR, the agency would make another stab at implementing competitive bidding on a national scale with a rebid of Round One this year. Last July, Congress delayed the DMEPOS program for at least 18 months so the many procedural and other problems could be fixed. But home care advocates have said that very few of the issues raised then have been addressed in the IFR and, in their comments, many pleaded with CMS to withdraw the rule. Ellen S. Durrence, owner of an HME business in South Carolina, pointed out that competitive bidding originated to save Medicare 12 percent in 2006. Since then, she said, Medicare has shaved payment amounts by some 5 percent, and in January of this year, CMS instituted another 9.5 percent cut on 10 product categories. “This equals around 14.5 percent reduction! This is more than 12 percent, so why destroy the industry and the access to health care for the elderly by implementing the competitive bidding program when the goal is more than met?” Durrence questioned. “Small DME companies like the one I run will close with competitive bidding, competition will be no more with competitive bidding, and competition is one of the original conditions for participation of [the] Medicare program,” she added. “This is America, and the ability to run a company and serve your customers and make a difference will be gone! Please, rescind the competitive bidding rule completely!!! Let Americans keep their businesses and serve the patients that they have come to know.” Gloria Knutson, an Arizona provider, wrote: “The entire competitive bidding program is and has been a disaster. It was not well thought out, [it] eliminates patients’ ability to choose their providers, and I believe [it] will lower quality of care and products. “CMS already controls costs; making all providers bid against one another to provide a service is crazy. I don't want to lose my clients, many of whom I have been providing medical items and equipment to for several years and have a relationship with, to another provider just because he wins the bid. This plan and rule [were] conceived by those who know nothing about the industry and real world. Stop the implementation of competitive bidding totally. There are other ways to control costs--the DME providers are not the problem.” In its comments, the American Association for Homecare also asked CMS to withdraw the IFR and issue a proposed rule. “CMS sidestepped all of the important procedural protections inherent in rulemaking by publishing an IFR with an effective date approximately one month before the deadline for submitting comments,” AAHomecare asserted. The organization also called on CMS to “convene the [Program Advisory and Oversight Committee] as well as solicit comments on its proposal to revise financial documentation requirements and explain, in detail, its plans for implementing the new oxygen rules under the program and provide an analysis of the combined impact of a 9.5 percent payment reduction and competitive bidding on small businesses.” As well, the association said, CMS should review the “factors that hampered an effective roll-out of Round One and address how it proposes to prevent their recurrence.” Some state associations also submitted comments on the IFR, including the Ohio Association of Medical Equipment Services, which said CMS underestimated the magnitude of the program and its impact. ”As a state with two bidding areas in Round One, we have been on the front lines of the roll-out of this program since its inception and witnessed firsthand the lack of clear communication and timely information throughout all stages, even up to the final hours before launch,” OAMES said. “The program’s real impact on seniors’ lives, the delivery of their health care services and the small businesses and continuum of care professionals providing these home care services are too important to be hastened through a tight timetable with vague direction.” WSJ Article Highlights Consumer Worries
“Millions of older and disabled people could face stiff new restrictions on where they go for medical equipment under a Medicare plan to overhaul how the federal insurer pays for such devices,” wrote reporter Barbara Martinez. The article quoted AAHomecare President Tyler Wilson as saying, “Competitive bidding is going to eliminate 90 percent of home care providers. The result is going to be lower quality and lower access to care for seniors and people with disabilities.” Martinez also talked to other organizations representing beneficiaries, such as the Paralyzed Veterans of America and the United Spinal Association. Each indicated concern about patient access to proper equipment. And Jerry Jones, a ventilator-dependent patient from Hamilton, Ohio, told the newspaper he uses multiple pieces of equipment to deal with his pulmonary hypertension. He’s worried, he said, about losing his current provider who comes out to check all the equipment once a week. But the story also quoted CMS' Laurence Wilson, director of the chronic care policy group, who said competitive bidding would provide "value to Medicare and its beneficiaries, as well as taxpayers." The newspaper noted Medicare could save $1 billion a year with the bidding program in place, pointing out that the government pays "$4,000 for a power wheelchair, for instance," but says the same item "can be bought on the Internet for $2,200." The story prompted Waterloo, Iowa-based member services group VGM to urge its members to forward the article “to all beneficiaries and encourage them to get in touch with their congressional members to ‘raise the alarm.’” AAHomecare sent the article to more than 400 Capitol Hill offices. Meanwhile, AAHomecare moved to attack competitive bidding from another angle. In a congressional email and press releases on Wednesday, the association applauded President Barack Obama’s plan to aid small businesses by making $15 billion in loans available. However, the association noted, the president could actually save multitudes of small businesses “by rescinding the ‘competitive’ bidding regulations issued in the final hours of the previous administration.” In its email, AAHomecare recommended legislators request that Obama rescind the competitive bidding rule and “consider ways in which the home medical sector already provides a cost-effective and quality-focused health care solution to Americans today.” How do you feel about President Obama’s plan/budget for health care reform? To vote in HomeCare's monthly Web poll, visit www.homecaremag.com. It's Vegas, Baby! Medtrade Spring Opens Tomorrow LAS VEGAS--With more than 250 exhibitors and 70 educational sessions, Medtrade Spring organizers say this year’s show, Tuesday through Thursday at the Las Vegas Convention Center, includes a number of opportunities both for networking and for gaining the latest information on the slew of changes affecting the industry. One of the most controversial among those changes is the 36-month cap on home oxygen and related post-cap payment rules, which will be addressed in an expanded "Washington Update" session from the American Association for Homecare. After working for the past 45 days to build consensus on an oxygen reform plan that would eliminate the cap and exclude oxygen from competitive bidding, the association will outline a draft plan, including a new payment methodology, that will be proposed to Congress. (See story this issue.) At this important session, to be held Wednesday at 2 pm in Room N261, you can learn more about the plan, what it could mean to Medicare's oxygen benefit--and give your input. Other show highlights: --Don't miss the fourth annual Stand Up for Homecare reception Tuesday from 5:30-7 pm at the Las Vegas Hilton. Hosted by AAHomecare, the event will raise funds to maintain a public awareness campaign promoting the mission of home care. --Enjoy a beverage, games and network with peers at Medtrade Madness, Wednesday afternoon on the show floor from 4-5 pm. --Join the DME MACs on Thursday morning from 9:45-10:45 am for an hour of Medicare updates. Staff from each of the four MACs, the NSC (National Supplier Clearinghouse), the CEDI (Common Electronic Data Interchange) and the CBIC (Competitive Bidding Implementation Contractor) will also be available to provide information and address questions during the show at Booth 932. --Check out the industry’s latest products at the New Product Pavilion, sponsored by HomeCare. The Pavilion will be open during exhibition hours on the show floor from 11 am-5 pm Wednesday and 11 am-3 pm Thursday. While you’re at the show, stop by to see HomeCare in Booth 635 and sign up for a free subscription. For more information about Medtrade Spring and Medtrade 2009, visit www.medtrade.com. In related show news, Medtrade and AAHomecare announced they have embarked on a new agreement to benefit the HME industry's support programs. Nielsen Business Media, producers of Medtrade and Medtrade Spring, and AAHomecare announced Friday they have signed a new 15-year contract that enhances a current agreement between the two entities first implemented in 1988. Effective next year, the agreement guarantees substantial monetary support to the association’s advocacy programs. “We worked with AAHomecare’s board of directors and leadership team to ensure the long-term agreement ... offers continued support of the association and its critical involvement in the home medical equipment industry,” said Joe Randall, senior vice president, Nielsen Business Media. “We are confident the new agreement that has been created will accomplish these goals.” According to AAHomecare President and CEO Tyler Wilson, “These are challenging times for the HME sector, and this important agreement with Medtrade will strengthen the association financially and provide us with another source of revenue in addition to dues from members. That means we can devote more resources to government affairs advocacy for HME providers to ensure better HME policies that will strengthen home care for the millions of Americans who depend on it." Under the agreement, AAHomecare will take on an expanded role in advising Nielsen on issues surrounding the industry. “Our goal is to have more stakeholders in the HME sector participating in the Medtrade shows as both exhibitors and attendees. Medtrade is a great venue for manufacturers to meet with customers and for providers to get the latest in industry education,” Wilson said. Oxygen Stakeholders Step Up Work on Benefit Overhaul ARLINGTON, Va.--After working for weeks to find common ground on reform of Medicare’s oxygen benefit and repeal of the 36-month cap, the American Association for Homecare said Friday that a proposal is nearly complete. AAHomecare’s New Oxygen Coalition, a group representing a range of home oxygen stakeholders, has been meeting over the past 45 days to come to agreement over the reform plan, originally proposed by the association and the Council for Quality Respiratory Care. But some state associations balked at the plan because it did not immediately address the 36-month cap and the post-cap payment rules (see ”Oxygen Stakeholders Work toward Common Ground,” Feb. 9). There was also unease among some providers over how the CQRC plan would pay for oxygen under a case-mix adjusted system. Both Jason Rogers, president of the Georgia Association for Medical Equipment Services, and the Big Sky Association for Medical Equipment Services proposed alternate plans. But as the nation’s health reform debate speeds up, members of the NOC--which includes some state associations, VGM, The MED Group, the CQRC, the National Association of Independent Medical Equipment Suppliers and AAHomecare--have worked quickly to settle their differences. "The big push is to get a unified voice," Mike Calcaterra, Montana state chairman and legislative/DAC chair for the Big Sky association, told HomeCare Monday last month. "We need to make sure we are on message [in Washington] with something that is giving us immediate relief. We are already seeing providers closing their doors." According to AAHomecare, a NOC workgroup has been meeting in person and by phone to develop a reform plan that addresses the problems with the current Medicare oxygen payment system. The goal is to put the final reform plan into legislation that would be considered by Congress this year, the association said. “All of our political intelligence tells us that oxygen providers may face a further reduction in the reimbursement period from 36 to 18 or fewer months. Alternatively, or even in conjunction with a reduced reimbursement period, current payment rates could be severely cut,” said AAHomecare President and CEO Tyler Wilson. “Add to this state of affairs the prospect of competitive bidding. It is within that context that a reform plan is being proposed,” Wilson continued. “In essence, the NOC has developed a reform plan out of necessity (including admonitions from our allies on the Hill) because the home oxygen benefit is under siege.” Looking for consensus on the draft plan, the association has sent it out to state associations for vetting this week and is hoping for feedback--and endorsement--before the plan is put into final form. Wilson and Walt Gorski, AAHomecare vice president of government affairs, will detail the plan for attendees at the association’s “Washington Update” at Medtrade Spring on Wednesday, March 25. The session will take place at 2 pm in Room N261 at the Las Vegas Convention Center. OIG Recommends Reimbursement Reduction for NPWT WASHINGTON--HHS’ Office of Inspector General isn’t happy with what Medicare pays for negative pressure wound therapy pumps. In a report issued Thursday, the OIG said providers pay an average of $3,604 for new pumps compared to Medicare’s purchase price of $17,165--“more than four times the average price” paid by providers. Medicare reimburses $1,716 monthly for the pumps for the first three months. At that rate, the OIG said, providers “recouped the average cost of a new pump model in about two months. Moreover, if a beneficiary were to rent the pump for all of the 13 months allowed by Medicare, the beneficiary’s coinsurance alone ($3,599) would cover almost the entire average cost of a new pump model.” Medicare began paying for the pumps in 2001 when there was only one manufacturer--KCI--in the market. Since then, the OIG said a number of manufacturers have introduced new pump models and are charging "substantially less" for them. Aside from its pricing analysis, the OIG noted that all of the winning bids for the pumps in the first round of competitive bidding, averaging about $1,446 a month, were lower than Medicare’s current reimbursement. The review also found that providers were not communicating as required with almost a quarter of beneficiaries’ clinicians, and without that input, the OIG said, providers “cannot determine whether there is a continued medical need for a pump.” The OIG included NPWT in its workplan for 2009 after a review in 2007 found that 24 percent of claims did not meet Medicare coverage criteria. In addition, utilization rates put the category on the OIG radar. Between 2001 and 2007, Medicare payments for the pumps increased 583 percent, from $24 million to $164 million. The industry has argued, however, that use is going up because the therapy is effective. Based on its findings, the OIG recommended that CMS should use its inherent reasonableness authority to reduce the reimbursement amount for pumps and should also include the pumps in the second round of competitive bidding. Earlier this year, CMS said it would review all of the devices and codes in the NPWT category. Read the full OIG report here. Surety Bond Deadlines Firm, but Questions Remain BALTIMORE--CMS said last week the deadlines for DMEPOS providers’ surety bonds would be enforced as set out in its final rule on the new requirement--even though the agency has yet to pass on full details about its bond requirements to the surety industry or to those who must purchase the bonds. During a Special Open Door Forum Tuesday, the agency’s Frank Whelan went over provisions of the final rule, published in the Jan. 2 Federal Register. The rule requires providers applying for Medicare enrollment and those changing ownership or opening a new location to have a bond in place by May 4. And by Oct. 2, all HME providers participating in Medicare will need surety bonds for at least $50,000 per NPI number. (For more, see "AAHomecare, VGM to Offer Surety Bonds,” Jan. 12.) Whelan said the National Supplier Clearinghouse will reject a pending provider’s enrollment application if a bond has not been submitted by May 4. For any application submitted on or after May 4, the NSC will reject the application if the provider does not furnish a valid surety bond at the time it submits an application. For enrolled providers, Whelan said, failure to submit a bond by Oct. 2 “will result in revocation of the supplier’s billing privileges.” According to providers and surety company representatives calling in to the teleconference, however, CMS has not yet released the exact language required for a bond to surety bond issuers. “The bottom line is there is no standard, one-size-fits-all federal government-approved bond form that has been created,” Whelan said, although he noted there are specific items that a bond must cover and certain terms that must be included in a bond, and those are given in the final rule. Whelan also said CMS plans to issue an MLN Matters article on the bond requirement and would post surety bond FAQs for providers and bond companies on its Web site. But several teleconference listeners emphasized the late date. “The May 4 deadline is rapidly approaching and there has been a tremendous amount of questions from the provider community as well as those that have to provide the bond itself, so we’d like to get some sense of when we might expect specific answers on some of these questions,” one caller commented. “The FAQs will be posted any day now,” Whelan responded. “This will be the first batch of FAQs, and they will be updated on a regular basis. While I do understand your concern about this, we also believe it's important that we provide consistent answers to the supplier community. We’ll try to do so as rapidly as we can, but we want to make sure that everybody is on the same page.” Another caller from Michigan said her company had been trying “to find someone to do a surety bond and are unable to do that. [What happens] if we can’t find anyone to do a surety bond for us?” she asked. She and others whose questions went hanging were asked to send an email to Whelan (frank.whelan@cms.hhs.gov) or told their questions would be addressed in the forthcoming FAQs. In the interim, Whelan said he would take email questions from all providers. Among items that were clarified during the call: --The surety bond is predicated on an NPI number, not on a tax ID
number. If a provider has two separately enrolled DMEPOS locations, each
with its own NPI, a $50,000 bond must be obtained for each site.
An audio recording and transcript of the March 17 teleconference will be posted to the Special Open Door Forum Web site and will be accessible beginning March 25. FAMES Regroups: Joan Cross Is New Executive Director BRADENTON, Fla.--With the intent of restructuring the Florida Association of Medical Equipment Service, Joan Cross, a veteran home medical equipment provider and former president of FAMES, has been named executive director of the organization. “With 23 years in the industry, 17 years on the board of FAMES and seven years as president or vice president, Ms. Cross brings a high level of experience and competency to FAMES,” said Greg Sims of Gator Custom Mobility in Gainesville, the association’s president. One of the oldest--and once one of the largest--state associations, FAMES quietly closed its doors earlier this year, apparently because of financial difficulties. But long-time members, believing the number of looming issues affecting the industry demand a strong state association, have regrouped. The new board of directors includes Sims; Raul Lopez of Bayshore Dura Medical in Miami Lakes, immediate past president; Jamie Loper of Gator Custom Mobility, vice president; John Stelzner of Respironics, Murrysville, Pa., vice president; and Rene Gaspar from Alma Respiratory, St. Petersburg, vice president. “We have just been trying to recoup a little bit and move offices to Bradenton where I am,” said Cross, who, with her husband Alan, owns C&C Homecare in Bradenton. She said the offices are located at C&C temporarily until new office space can be found. The important thing is, FAMES is now accessible. “We got our phone number back up and running and our Web site should be back up [soon],” Cross said, adding that the group is also catching up on some back bills. The revamped FAMES will focus on national and state issues, she said. “[Board members] each have very delineated jobs. Raul will be heading up our state issues. I will be doing national issues. Jamie will be the vice president focusing on our conferences, which we hope to expand. There’s always something somebody should know. If you are armed with information, then you have a better chance of getting people to be more proactive, and that’s what I am looking for.” Cross said she is aware that some providers were frustrated by what they perceived as FAMES’ weak efforts to fight competitive bidding when it was rolled out last year by CMS. She said membership in the organization declined and, while she doesn’t know yet how many members remain, it is far fewer than the high of 200. That latter was achieved when, in 2002, FAMES spearheaded--and won--a fierce $200,000 legal battle against a competitive bidding proposal in Florida. “At the time of the competitive bidding fight in the state, FAMES was absolutely fabulous,” Cross recalled. “There was a lot of energy and a lot of people dedicated to the cause.” But after last year’s turbulent times, association membership declined. “All of a sudden, FAMES was in trouble,” Cross said. “Did FAMES make some mistakes? They did. But are we going to correct those and move on and be bigger and better? Absolutely. I believe that. “To get the people of Florida to trust us again, that’s a goal for me,” she added. The new executive director said she was disappointed that another state association--the Florida Alliance of Health Care Services--has just been launched (see story this issue), but she hopes the two organizations can support each other. Cross also said that she and her husband have put C&C up for sale. “I’ve been doing this so long, it’s going to be like cutting off my arm,” Cross said, noting she and Alan have co-owned the home oxygen and sleep business for 23 years. “It’s just one of those things where we made that decision one day and we know it’s the right one.” For more information about FAMES, call 407/895-5573. Florida Providers Form New State Association DORAL, Fla.--Sunshine State members of the Accredited Medical Equipment Providers of America have banded together to form a new state association, the Florida Alliance of Home Care Services, the group announced Wednesday. The news comes in tandem with last week's announcement that the Florida Association of Medical Equipment Services, which quietly closed in January, is being restructured (see story this issue). FAHCS grew out of calls from Florida home medical equipment providers for stronger representation in the state and a state voice at the national level, said Rob Brant, president of AMEPA and owner of City Medical Services in Miami. "[AMEPA] members wanted to have representation in Tallahassee," Brant said, noting that legislators in Florida's capital city are, among other things, discussing cuts to Medicaid programs, bringing competitive bidding back for Medicaid and making changes to state licensure. As well, he said, CMS is set to make another go at national competitive bidding and Florida has two of the largest MSAs in the first round of the program. So it is important, he said, for Florida's voice to be united on the national level as the battle continues to sideline the DMEPOS bidding program permanently. "We need stronger representation," Brant said. Roger Ribas, owner of Hometown Medical Supply in Doral and president of the new organization, said serious issues at both state and national levels demand that, in order to be heard, state provider associations be strong and effective in getting their message across. "We really didn't have any representation … We really had no voice," said Ribas, who told his fellow providers that FAHCS had to exist "because no one has. There has been a hole in leadership in this state and our patients are too important not to have a voice." According to Sean Schwinghammer, a senior advisor to AMEPA who will serve as acting director of FAHCS, more than 20 AMEPA members from Florida attended AAHomecare's Washington fly-in last month. "Legislators wanted to know what our state association was," Schwinghammer said. "Our state association didn't even have a phone number. "This is a major state in the number of providers, patients per capita and therefore, it is vital that we have an active, engaged organization to represent providers," he added. Once the decision was made to organize, the fledgling group kicked into gear, talking with leaders in other successful state associations and creating bylaws and a code of ethics for its members. In addition to Ribas and Schwinghammer, the Alliance has named Deana Rollyson of Matrix Medical, Plant City, as vice president; Rudy Hernandez of South Florida Medical, Doral, treasurer; and Jerry Hall of Hall-Moore Medical, Jacksonville, secretary. The new state association will not be a part of AMEPA, Brant said. However, all Florida AMEPA members who have renewed their membership in 2009 or who became members after June 30, 2008, will automatically become FAHCS members. AMEPA has more than 130 accredited provider members from Florida, Brant said, and 20 additional Florida associate members such as manufacturers, billing companies, consultants, attorneys and other industry vendors. This week's announcement that FAMES was reorganizing did not deter FAHCS from moving forward. "FAHCS is not opposed to any group that is trying to better the industry," Schwinghammer said. The important thing is that Florida providers get the leadership they need on a state level, he said, and he believes FAHCS can provide it. "There was a lack of leadership and inability to respond at the biggest crisis in the history of the industry," Schwinghammer said, referring to last year's industry fight to derail competitive bidding and halt the 36-month oxygen rental cap. "We have many providers who are Medicaid providers," he added. "There has been no voice in changing state licensure issues, fraud issues. We want to be really engaged with the state legislature and the [Florida] Agency of Health Care Administration on rules and in making sure the direction of government comports properly with the reality of patient care and business." In addition, he said, "We have a code of professional conduct that the board has already adopted and members will need to agree to. We understand that Florida has been a hotbed of fraud, and it needs to have a state association that is exceedingly active in the elimination of fraud. We've got to be active in advising on licensing, checks and balances to eliminate fraud … Combating fraud is a prime issue of this organization. No one needs to do it more than us." Continued Schwinghammer, "It's vital that we speak and that we lead. We've got to be active as the state representative, active on the state level, active in education, active as the spokesperson for the industry and very active in standing up for the industry." While the organization's Web site is not yet effective, Schwinghammer invites inquiries at info@FAHCS.org. NEMED Speaks Out at Vermont Health Care Summit BURLINGTON, Vt.--The New England Medical Equipment Dealers Association earned a place in the spotlight at the second regional health care reform summit sponsored by the Obama administration last week. Moderated by Vermont Gov. Jim Douglas, Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick and Nancy-Ann Min DeParle, newly appointed director of the White House Office for Health Reform, the event drew some 400 people. It is one of five being held around the country. The first was held in Detroit and others are yet to come in Iowa (today), North Carolina (March 31) and California (April 6). NEMED sent a delegation of three: Karyn Estrella, executive director, Gary Sheehan of Cape Medical Supplies in Sandwich, Mass., and Bob Simmons from Boston Home Infusion. Sheehan was the first person chosen to speak, Estrella said. “He did a great job talking about the value of home care and the challenges of being a small business. His comments were well received,” she said, adding that both governors and DeParle referred to Sheehan’s statements and concerns several times during the meeting. In additon to addressing the moderators, NEMED also drafted a statement that Estrella delivered to DeParle. The statement called for an “honest assement of all health care delivery models that are available” and made a case for HME as a cost-efficient model for health care. “Oxygen can be provided to a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patient who lives at home for one full year at less than the average Medicare cost for one day in the hospital, which is $3,606,” the association noted. “The average Medicare payment for stationary and portable oxygen equipment is approximately $230 per month, or less than $8 a day.” NEMED also asked three questions in the letter: 1) Does the administration recognize the value home care provides?
Following a White House health summit March 5, Obama called the regional summits to get public input on health care concerns. The president has said he wants a health care reform package passed by the end of the year. For more, see “State Associations Seek a Say at Health Care Summits,” March 16. Health Care Reform Debate Heats Up WASHINGTON--As Congress prepares to tackle health care reform, Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, staked his ground at an early morning briefing with reporters Thursday. Reform needs to be all encompassing, but if it includes a new federal health benefit, Grassley said, that could be a deal-breaker. As the ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee, which has jurisdiction over Medicare and Medicaid, Grassley--who has previously worked with HME stakeholders on issues including competitive bidding--will be a key player in shaping the nation’s health reform effort. That effort is now on the fast track, with legislators from both sides of the aisle working to get a bill to the floor by June. “I think if it doesn’t get done this year, it won’t be done for the next four years,” Grassley said of health reform, citing the timing of the country’s political cycle. “If it doesn’t get done this year, why won’t it get done? One word: elections.” What’s more, Grassley said the overhaul must be comprehensive. “If we do something incremental this year we’re never going to get comprehensive health reform,” he said during the briefing, hosted by the Kaiser Family Foundation, Families USA and the National Federation of Independent Businesses. While “everything’s on the table” as far as negotiating wide-ranging reform, Grassley said, he pointed to one big stumbling block: differences over a government insurance plan, which some call a “public plan option,” that would be open to most Americans. “This is a deal-breaker for Republicans if it’s in and it’s a deal-breaker for Democrats if it’s not,” Grassley said. Some Democrats believe such a benefit would improve quality of care and decrease costs. But Grassley and other Republicans oppose creating a public plan because, he said, it would be “a step toward single-payer, government-run health care for everyone.” He added that a study by the Lewin Group estimated such a system and could prompt as many as 118 million people to leave private health plans for government-sponsored health care. In the end, he said, “The major difference is the extent to which we will have a market-based insurance system or a government-based insurance system.” While he did not touch on HME issues in the briefing, Grassley did say health reform legislation should be budget-neutral, with any new spending offset by cuts or new revenue. The HME industry is already on edge about further cuts to oxygen and the renewed threat of Medicare competitive bidding. Earlier this year, however, Grassley introduced the Medicare Rural Health Access improvement Act of 2009, which would exempt rural areas from competitive bidding, although it would not eliminate the program entirely. Last week, Grassley appeared in a YouTube video asking for people's thoughts on health reform. "It only makes sense to seek input on an issue like health care reform where so many Americans have a stake. I look forward to taking common sense input from YouTube users to the national debate on health care reform," he said. Grassley's video will be featured through tomorrow on YouTube's Senate Hub, where anyone can add comments. In a second video today, he will respond to some of the comments posted to the original video. In Brief Bohner: Reconsider Oxygen Cap; CMS Sends Accreditation Reminder As the home oxygen sector works to reshape Medicare's oxygen benefit, last week House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, wrote CMS Acting Administrator Charlene Frizzera to ask that the agency reconsider the payment policy and provide oxygen payments throughout the beneficiary’s period of medical need. Bohner said he was concerned that the lack of payments for maintenance and services post-36 months would jeopardize the quality of care that patients have come to expect from their provider. “Not only does this policy potentially harm the current care that many Medicare beneficiaries are receiving," Boehner wrote in the March 18 letter, "but oxygen providers may be forced to make difficult decisions and reduce services that these beneficiaries and their physicians traditionally rely upon.” Are You Accredited Yet? Obama Campaign Adviser Named to HHS IT Post Pride Pairs with College Students on Design Ideas ADVERTISEMENT |
|
About this Newsletter You are subscribed to this newsletter as #email# To unsubscribe from this newsletter go to: Unsubscribe To subscribe to this newsletter, go to: Subscribe To visit HomeCare's Web site click here For information on advertising in this newsletter, please contact Kent Peterson, National Sales Manager/Western Region Sales at kpeterson@homecaremag.com, or John McNamara, Regional Sales Manager/Eastern Region Sales at jmcnamara@homecaremag.com. |
|
|
|
To get this newsletter in a different format (Text or HTML),
or to change your e-mail address, please visit your profile
page to change your delivery preferences.
For questions concerning delivery of this newsletter, please contact our
Customer Service Department at: Penton Media | 249 W. 17th Street | New York, NY 10011 Copyright 2009, Penton Media. All rights reserved. This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be reproduced, rewritten, distributed, re-disseminated, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast, directly or indirectly, in any medium without the prior written permission of Penton Media. |