View this email as a Web page Please add MRT Bulletin to your Safe Sender list.

February 28, 2008 A Penton Media Property

ADVERTISEMENT


SPONSORED BY
ADVERTISEMENT


CONTENTS
Fro
m Our Magazines:
Early rebanding work reveals pitfall in process

IWCE: JPS, Clarity partner on radio-cellular interoperability

IWCE: Space Data keeps its feet on the ground to provide iDEN offering

IWCE: HYT America introduces new radios

IWCE: P25 multi-band radio connects agencies across frequencies

Affordable spectrum analyzers

Dekolink launches distributed antenna system for first responders

Catalyst announces IP console

Raveon Technologies offers GPS tracking transponder

Codan introduces Manpack transceiver

PEPRO launches remote antenna control


About This Newsletter
To unsubscribe from this newsletter go to: Unsubscribe

To subscribe to this newsletter, go to: Subscribe

For information on advertising in this newsletter, please contact: Dennis Hegg


 

Wavelengths
Early rebanding work reveals pitfall in process
By Donny Jackson
February 28, 2008

LAS VEGAS--During the past three years, the primary focus of public-safety organizations impacted by 800 MHz rebanding has been negotiating deals with Sprint Nextel and getting the blessing of the Transition Administrator and the FCC.

These negotiations -- typically involving mediation -- have taken much longer than originally anticipated, but they are getting done. On a panel yesterday at the International Wireless Communications Expo (IWCE), TA Director Brett Haan said 55% of all NPSPAC licensees nationwide have signed rebanding pacts with Sprint Nextel.

Now comes the hard part: actually completing the work.

Haan said more than 100 NPSPAC licensees have finished their rebanding work, but most of these completions have occurred in systems that were relatively uncomplicated. For larger, more complex systems, getting the work done requires careful planning and attention to even the smallest details.

But, no matter how thorough the preparation, things happen that require plans to be altered. For instance, a date could have been set months ago to reband mobile vehicles in a given city. However, if every mobile vehicle is needed on the street that day because the presidential candidates decided to come to town and stump for votes, it may not be possible to get the work done as scheduled. Of course, severe weather is always a potential complication.

"This happens in every large engineering project," said Chuck Jackson, Motorola's vice president of system operations. "This is not unique to rebanding."

In such situations, the vendor typically discusses the situation with the customer -- the city, in the above scenario -- and a change order is made that usually adds cost to the project. Instead of waiting until the next meeting of elected officials to get approval, a vendor often completes the work with the understanding that approval from the city council or other elected body will be secured in the future. No one likes change orders, but they are a common occurrence.

However, in a typical project, the customer is paying for the project. That's not the case with rebanding, which is funded by Sprint Nextel. The scenario has created a situation for vendors and licensees regarding change orders that is "scary," according to Danielle Marcella, senior project manager for M/A-COM.

Because Sprint Nextel is paying the bill, it -- and, potentially, the TA or FCC -- needs to approve a change order to ensure that those performing the work will get paid for their efforts. That means altering the rebanding contract, which is not an easy process.

But what if Sprint Nextel -- or the TA or the FCC -- determines the change order does not meet the "reasonable and prudent" test? If the work has already been done, the licensee has to pay an unexpected bill or the vendor simply has to eat the cost.

"Any licensee or vendor who performs work that is not specified in the FRA is at risk," Marcella said. "When it's a small amount, it's not a big deal. But, when it is several hundreds of thousands of dollars, it is a big problem."

And it's a problem that can snowball throughout the country as rebanding proceeds. To date, negotiations have been focused on getting the job done for the least amount of money possible -- including the removal of normal contingency fees -- with the understanding that "actual costs" will be paid by Sprint Nextel, Marcella said. While vendors may view actual costs as whatever is necessary to get the job done, Sprint Nextel may see things differently when applying the "reasonable and prudent" test to a change order.

M/A-COM has been burned by this scenario already, Marcella said. While she declined to describe the details of M/A-COM's situation, Marcella painted a picture of a hypothetical scenario.

Let's say a public-safety agency negotiated a rebanding deal that called for all radios to be retuned or replaced in a 10-day period. Upon starting the job, complications discovered while doing the work makes it clear that it will actually take 30 days to complete. Both the licensee and the vendor want to proceed as quickly as possible -- something the FCC says it wants -- but neither may be comfortable working beyond the 10th day out of fear that Sprint Nextel won't pay for the work, Marcella said.

If the work stops on the 10th day, all remaining radios would have to wait to be retuned until after the change order is approved and the appropriate resources -- equipment and technical personnel -- can return to the area, which promises to become increasingly challenging as the schedules of those who can do the work get overbooked as the rebanding schedule proceeds.

"In terms of trying to manage the schedule, we are all in a very precarious position because it is all at risk and there is no guarantee that anybody will be paid for any of that [change-order] work," Marcella said. I can see that is going to impact schedules very greatly because I can see everyone taking a stand that says, 'We will not perform any work at risk without any funding avenue.'"

This is an issue that is not going away anytime soon and requires attention from the FCC immediately. Without a good change-order process, rebanding could continue well beyond the 2012 timetable that most in the industry believe will be necessary to complete the massive project.

E-mail me at djackson@mrtmag.com.



ADVERTISEMENT
Dublin, Ohio Goes Wireless with Cisco Mobility Solutions

The City of Dublin, Ohio, and DHB Networks, installed a citywide wireless mesh network to improve public safety and drive economic development. Using Cisco's wireless mobility technology it provides in-vehicle access for low enforcement applications. For additional information, click here.

In the news
IWCE: JPS, Clarity partner on radio-cellular interoperability
By Glenn Bischoff
February 28, 2008    
LAS VEGAS--Raytheon JPS Communications is demonstrating at IWCE 2008 this week, in collaboration with Clarity Communications Systems, a solution that leverages the company's ACU-2000 IP gateway device to deliver interoperable communications between land mobile radios and cellular handsets.

IWCE: Space Data keeps its feet on the ground to provide iDEN offering
By Donny Jackson
February 28, 2008    
LAS VEGAS--Arizona-based Space Data will use its nationwide 900 MHz spectrum to extend iDEN services in the United States, particularly in rural areas, the company announced this week at the International Wireless Communication Expo (IWCE) at the Las Vegas Convention Center

IWCE: HYT America introduces new radios
By Donny Jackson and Mary Rose Roberts
February 28, 2008    
LAS VEGAS--HYT America this week is unveiling a number of new analog portable radios and its first repeater at the International Wireless Communications Expo (IWCE) this week at the Las Vegas Convention Center.

IWCE: P25 multi-band radio connects agencies across frequencies
By Mary Rose Roberts
February 28, 2008    
LAS VEGAS--The U.S. Department of Homeland Security's Science and Technology (S&T) Directorate demonstrated a Project 25 (P25) multi-band radio capable of supporting multiple public-safety frequency bands yesterday at the 2008 International Wireless Communications Expo.


ADVERTISEMENT
Boulder County Improves Service Effectiveness and Incident Response with Cisco IPICS. "The other solutions that we looked at provided landmobile radio interoperability only. Cisco IPICS gives us much more flexibility because it enables comprehensive communications interoperability using any device." -- Drew Depler, IT Customer Support Manager, Boulder County, Colorado.
The story continues here.

More News
Affordable spectrum analyzers
February 28, 2008    


Dekolink launches distributed antenna system for first responders
February 28, 2008   


Catalyst announces IP console
February 28, 2008    


Raveon Technologies offers GPS tracking transponder
February 28, 2008    


Codan introduces Manpack transceiver
February 28, 2008    


PEPRO launches remote antenna control
February 28, 2008    



ADVERTISEMENT
Municipal Wireless Networks

Municipal wireless is growing fast connecting government with businesses and citizens, improving public safety, and opening up greater economic opportunities. Three models for municipal wireless networks are common; the system can be municipally owned and operated, wholesale or a public/private partnership. Visit www.cisco.com/go/outdoorwireless for more information.

You are subscribed to this newsletter as #email#

To get this newsletter in a different format (Text or HTML), or to change your e-mail address, please visit your profile page to change your delivery preferences.

For questions concerning delivery of this newsletter, please contact our Customer Service Department at:
Customer Service Department
Mobile Radio Technology
A Penton Media publication
US Toll Free: 866-505-7173
International: 847-763-9504
Email:mrtmag@pbinews.com

Penton Media
9800 Metcalf Avenue
Overland Park, KS 66212

Copyright 2007, Penton Media. All rights reserved. This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be reproduced, rewritten, distributed, re-disseminated, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast, directly or indirectly, in any medium without the prior written permission of Penton Media.