View this email as a Web page Please add NHF_North American Preview_ to your Safe Sender list.

May 9, 2008 A Penton Media Property



Table Of Contents
Pork’s Part in the Farm Bill
Antibiotic Use on the Docket
Farm Bill Agreement



What's new on National Hog Farmer?

2007 Swine Research Review
- Variation: You Can Manage It, But You Can't Avoid It
- Top Health Produces Consistent Throughput
- Free Gilt Selection Posters Now Available for Download
- Special Section: Green Farming Practices

- Current Issue: Managing Variation
NationalHogFarmer.com



About This Newsletter
Send Comments & Questions To
Dale Miller, Editor, National Hog Farmer

To unsubscribe from this newsletter go to: Unsubscribe

To subscribe to this newsletter, go to: Subscribe


 

Market Preview
(Editor's note: This column was written before Senate and House farm bill conference leaders agreed on a final draft of the 2008 farm bill. See Legislative Update, below, for current details.)

Pork’s Part in the Farm Bill
The 2008 farm bill continues to slog through Congress. The bill is still in conference committee where conferees from both houses are trying to work out the differences between their two versions. If and when those differences get ironed out, the conference report will go back to both houses for an up-or-down vote with no amendments allowed.

There are still some substantial differences in the two versions, primarily revolving around funding and what many view as “juggling the books” to make the costs and revenues work. It does not appear that the Bush administration is buying much of that. A veto threat still hangs over the entire proceedings.

The farm bill contains several features directly related to hog and pork markets and marketing. They include:
  • Changes in mandatory country-of-origin labeling (MCOOL).

    • Provision for a multi-country label that would cover animals that originate in Canada and are slaughtered in the United States. Product from any animals born in Canada, whether they were fed in Canada or in the United States would be labeled “Product of Canada and the United States.” There is some flexibility in how the rules (i.e. the actual operating instructions of the law) will be written, so it is not completely clear what the labels will say or just how much flexibility will be provided for packers, processors and retailers.

    • Provisions for a “May contain product from ____“ label on ground meat, where all of the countries from which product may reasonably come are listed. This is a big deal for ground beef.

    • MCOOL verification records limited to those kept in the “normal conduct of business.”

    • A hard date to establish animals from which product may be labeled “Product of the United States.” The trouble is that this currently reads Jan. 1, 2008. It is very likely that conferees will change this date – probably to July – due to the delays in getting the bill through.

  • A provision to fund a study of mandatory reporting for wholesale pork cuts. The small percentage of pigs (around 10%) for which prices are negotiated each day has driven interest in improving the quality of USDA hog cutout value – which is based on wholesale pork cut prices. The problem is that the voluntary system for wholesale pork reporting has resulted in low reporting of an already thinly traded market. The Secretary of Agriculture has the authority to do this. The Farm Bill just calls for a study. Many in the industry think this should be used to lay the groundwork for a system similar to that being used for beef.
There were also a couple of items that were omitted in the Senate version of the bill. Most notable is the deletion of the ban on packer ownership, which has long been championed by Senator Charles Grassley (R-IA). Producers have differing opinions on this topic, but I believe a large majority opposed it due to the very real possibility that the provision would have been used to outlaw marketing contracts. This is the second time that Senator Grassley and his colleagues in the Senate have put the provision in a Farm Bill and the second time that it has been taken out in conference.

The second item deleted was a change to the mandatory price reporting system that would have delayed the afternoon reports. The idea was promoted as a way to capture a larger proportion of the hogs priced on a given day in order to reduce the possibility of manipulating prices, especially on formula-priced pigs. No one knows just how much the delay might have accomplished, but I believe the gain would have been small.

Rules to enact the mandatory price reporting system changes made in 2006 will apparently finally be published – maybe. The system was reauthorized in October 2006 for a 5-year period, so by the time the rule is published, the effective period will be down to less that 2.5 years. The deadline for packers to report prior-day slaughter data will be changed from 7 a.m. to 9 a.m. No change will be made for prior-day purchase data since those data are more critical for knowing the current market situation. In addition, the definition of a pork packer will be changed to expand the coverage of those that slaughter sows and boars.

John Reddington, vice president of the American Meat Institute (the meat packers’ trade association) told attendees at the National Pork Board’s Pork Management Conference that the export situation with Russia might get worse. Russia delisted four U.S. plants the week before last for allegedly excess residues of tetracycline. The announcement came the day before Russian officials left on Easter holiday. They will return on Monday and there are rumors that up to 12 more plants will be delisted.

One problem is that U.S. officials do not know the levels of tetracycline actually found by Russian inspectors as no one has been in Moscow to tell them. Russia’s tolerance level for tetracycline is very near zero. All we currently know is that some greater level was apparently detected.

I commented last week that I wasn’t worried about this situation unless it spread to more plants. Delisting four plants leaves plenty of opportunities to ship pork to Russia. Delisting 16 plants will be much more problematic. We need exports to keep humming along!



Click to view graphs.

Steve R. Meyer, Ph.D.
Paragon Economics, Inc.
e-mail: steve@paragoneconomics.com





ADVERTISEMENT

Make ileitis disappear?

Denagard® (tiamulin) 10 is approved to control ileitis in as little as 10 days. And with its small dosage – 35 grams tiamulin/ton – and less medication time, no other feed medication is as cost-effective for controlling ileitis.






Click on the Denagard logo to learn more.

Production Preview
Antibiotic Use on the Docket
To date, a ban on subtherapeutic antibiotic use has not been implemented due to financial consequences it would cause to the livestock industry. However, political and social pressures are gaining leverage.

An example of such leverage is apparent in the Preservation of Antibiotics for Medical Treatments Act, sponsored by Senators Edward Kennedy and Olympia Snowe and Representative Louise Slaughter. This bill would ban subtherapeutic use of seven classes of medically important antibiotics in livestock and poultry, including penicillin, tetracycline, macrolides, lincosamides, streptogramins, aminoglycosides, and sulfonamides.

Such a ban on antibiotics would have a severe impact on animal health and welfare. Non-therapeutic usage of antibiotics to control and prevent disease would be much more restrictive and would result in increased animal morbidity. The ban would obviously limit the supply of necessary antibiotics and decrease the number of antibiotic classes available for use in treatment. As a result, more pressure would be placed on the remaining, unrestricted antibiotics for disease treatment in animals, which would increase their use and likely lower their efficacy in minimizing health problems over time.

On the other hand, public perception is important in the marketing of meat products. As a result, producers, agribusiness managers and pork industry leaders may need to reevaluate the way subtherapeutic antibiotics are used. Steve Henry, DVM, with the Abilene Animal Clinic in Abilene, KS, suggests that controlled antibiotic prescriptions may be the best way to monitor the use of subtherapeutics. “We need to preserve therapies for animal health, well-being, and prevention of disease and distress, not overuse them to increase growth,” he states.

With government intervention, more control over the use of antibiotics at the subtherapeutic level may be seen. However, controlled use is a far more appropriate step to reducing antibiotic levels than a ban. Currently, a thorough surveillance system for measuring and evaluating the use of antibiotics is lacking. The implementation of such a system would provide producers and veterinarians with more consistent, in-depth data and a higher degree of traceability.

By JoAnn Alumbaugh
Farms.com


Editor’s Note: To learn more about benchmarking, go to www.pigchamp.com. For all your agricultural news, markets and commentaries, go to www.farms.com



ADVERTISEMENT

Hermitage NGT

Hermitage NGT offers their North American clients:
  • Breeding Stock (GGP/GP/Parent stock)
  • Semen-fresh & frozen
  • Closed herd breeding programs
  • Genetic monitoring through the Hermitage BLUP recording system

Talk with our team of specialists in genetics, reproductive physiology, nutrition, veterinary medicine, pig production management and A.I. to design a program to allow you to take advantage of these exciting genetics.

www.hermitagengt.com

Legislative Preview
Farm Bill Agreement
A final agreement was reached by the Senate and House farm bill conference leaders. The final bill is expected to be released late this week or next Monday, with Congress voting on the bill next week. Nutrition spending will account for nearly 73% of the bill, commodity programs account for approximately 16%, and conservation spending will represent about 7% of the total farm bill expenditures. Following are some of the key provisions of the agreement:
  • Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) – Producers will have the option, beginning with the 2009 crop year, to participate in a state-level revenue protection system.
  • Rebalances Target Prices and Loan Rates – The bill adjusts loan rates and target prices of existing commodities beginning with the 2010 crop year.
  • Adjusted Gross Income Eligibility Test – To receive farm program benefits, an individual’s non-farm income may not exceed $500,000. If farm income exceeds $750,000, an individual will no longer be eligible to receive direct payments.
  • Disaster Assistance – Establishes a permanent disaster assistance program.
  • Environmental Quality Incentive Program (EQIP) – Provides an additional $3.4 billion for EQIP.
  • Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP) – CSP is focused on incentivizing new conservation, while simultaneously rewarding producers for achieving high levels of stewardship and addressing priority resource concerns in their area. The program will enroll nearly 115 million acres by 2017. This was formerly called the Conservation Security Program.
  • FMD & MAP – The Foreign Market Development Program (FMD) and the Market Access Program (MAP) continue funding at $34.5 million and $200 million, respectively.
  • Biomass Loan Guarantees – The bill provides $320 million in funding for loan guarantees for commercial scale biorefineries for advanced biofuels. This program is to help commercialize cellulosic ethanol.
  • Ethanol Credit Modification – The 51 cents/gallon credit for ethanol is reduced by 6 cents in the year after which the 7.5 billion-gallon threshold established in the 2005 Energy Policy Act is reached.
  • Cellulosic Biofuels – A new temporary production tax credit for up to $1.01/gal. is established for cellulosic biofuels.
More details on the farm bill will appear in next week’s North American Preview.

Farm Bill Veto Expected — Secretary of Agriculture Ed Schaefer, in a statement, declared: “For a year and a half, the Administration has been consistently clear that Congress needs to move forward with a good farm bill that the president can sign. They have failed to do so. This legislation lacks meaningful farm program reform and expands the size and scope of government. I have visited face to face with our president and he was direct and plain. The President will veto this bill."

Dueling Senator Letters — There were dueling Senate letters sent to Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) concerning the Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS). Senators Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX) and John McCain (R-AZ), along with 22 other Republican Senators, sent a letter to EPA regarding the state applications for a waiver of the RFS. The Senators asked EPA to take into account the food inflation concerns when considering the requests for a waiver of the RFS. The letter stated, “American families are feeling the financial strain of these food-to-fuel mandates in the grocery aisle and are growing concerned about the emerging environmental concerns of growing corn-based ethanol. It is essential for the EPA to respond quickly to the consequences of these mandates.” In a letter to EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson, Senators Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and Tim Johnson (D-SD) and a number of other Senators expressed strong opposition to any request to partially or completely waive the RFS. The letter stated, “We strongly disagree with the assumption that the renewable fuels mandate is harming the U.S. economy or that it’s primarily responsible for the global escalation of food costs.”

USDA Buys $50 Million of Pork — USDA plans to purchase up to $50 million of pork products that will be donated to child nutrition and other domestic food assistance programs. USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) will survey potential recipients to determine how much product will be accepted for shipping. Then USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service will seek the lowest overall cost bids to supply the products.

Downer Cattle Video — The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) released another video showing downer cattle being ignored or mistreated at livestock auctions and stockyards in Maryland, New Mexico, Pennsylvania and Texas. In a letter to Secretary of Agriculture Ed Schafer earlier this month, HSUS asked that USDA take the following steps:
  • Require immediate and humane euthanasia of all nonambulatory livestock, regardless of the reason(s) an animal went down, including nonambulatory livestock at stockyards, market agencies, at dealer facilities and on livestock trucks.
  • Except in cases where euthanasia is impossible in situ, nonambulatory animals may not be moved or transported.
  • In cases where movement is required, a nonambulatory animal must first be rendered unconscious and must remain unconscious until death.
  • Euthanasia must be performed by a competent and trained individual.
  • Clinical death must be confirmed prior to disposal.
Rail Transport Issues in Rural Areas — The House Committee on Small Business held a hearing to examine the impact of rail transport issues on rural small businesses and farms. According to the committee, rail transit has increased considerably and various railroad companies have consolidated with shipping rates going up by as much as 80%. Congresswoman Nydia Velazquez, chairwoman of the committee, said, “The nation’s rail system may be overstretched, but that does not give massive transport companies license for unreliable service or price gouging. When Congress passed the Staggers Act, it did not intend for rail monopolies to develop. Clearly, it’s time we revisit how the law is being enforced by the STB (Surface Transportation Board).”



ADVERTISEMENT

Introducing the new PIC Camborough® Family

You asked for greater lifetime reproductive performance and longevity. You asked for more pounds of pork marketed per sow. You asked for a higher percentage of market pigs in the full-value pay box.

Take another look at our new Camborough family, we think you will like what you see--after all, it is just what you asked for. www.pic.com/usa

Pork Industry Calendar
May 19-21, 2008: "Mitigating Air Emissions from Animal-Feeding Operations," Hotel Fort Des Moines, Des Moines, IA; contact: Robert Burns at Iowa State University, (515) 294-4203 or rburns@iastate.edu or click on http://www.abe.iastate.edu/wastemgmt/mitigation

May 29, 2008: PorkBridge "Large Group Pens and AutoSort Technology" remote program via phone and computer, noon and 7 p.m. CST; contact: Mark Whitney, (507) 389-5541, whitn007@umn.edu or click on www.extension.umn.edu/swine.

Click here to get National Hog Farmer's complete pork industry calendar.



ADVERTISEMENT

Ileitis immunity is as easy as turning on the water.
Enterisol® Ileitis keeps immunity on tap.
Call Boehringer Ingelheim at 1-800-325-9167

You are subscribed to this newsletter as #email#

To get this newsletter in a different format (Text or HTML), or to change your e-mail address, please visit your profile page to change your delivery preferences.

For questions concerning delivery of this newsletter, please contact our Customer Service Department at:
National Hog Farmer
A Penton Media publication
US Toll Free: 866-505-7173 International: 847-763-9504 Email:nationalhogfarmer@pbinews.com

Penton Media | 249 W. 17th Street | New York, NY 10011

Copyright 2008, Penton Media. All rights reserved. This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be reproduced, rewritten, distributed, re-disseminated, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast, directly or indirectly, in any medium without the prior written permission of Penton Media.