View this email as a Web page Please add NHF_North American Preview_ to your Safe Sender list.

September 5, 2008 A Penton Media Property



Table Of Contents
Rewriting Hog Price History
Oral Fluids Sampling Deemed Innovative
USDA Rule Bans Downer Cattle



What's new on National Hog Farmer?

- World Pork Expo 2008 New Product Tour
- 8 Tips for Tough Times
- Veterinary Group Raises Issues Over California Ballot Initiative
- Pork-Soybean Groups Unite For Research Collaboration

- Current Issue: World Pork Expo Product Tour
NationalHogFarmer.com



About This Newsletter
Send Comments & Questions To
Dale Miller, Editor, National Hog Farmer

To unsubscribe from this newsletter go to: Unsubscribe

To subscribe to this newsletter, go to: Subscribe


 

Market Preview
Rewriting Hog Price History
What a difference two weeks can make! My trip to Brazil last week and the associated e-mail challenges prevented my column about record-high hog prices from reaching the North American Preview editors. Too bad, because it’s not often that one gets to write about record hog prices. And too bad, since we have now seen the second-largest one-week decline in hog prices on record! So this week’s column is a bit about both occurrences.

Arriving at the conclusion that the week of Aug. 16 saw a record for farm-level hog prices is not an easy exercise since there is no consistent price series that covers all of history – or even that part back to 1974-75 when hog prices made their last quantum shift. Figure 1 shows a constructed price series from the Livestock Marketing Information Center that uses Iowa-Minnesota practical top live weight prices up to the mid 1990s, and then uses carcass weight quotes to mimic that practical top series. I am not 100% positive that the $90.43 week before last is perfectly comparable to the $89.27 of the week of June 2, 1990, but it is as close a comparison as I know of, so I’m going with it.

“It’s a record high hog price!”
Four such statements could have been made from 1973 to 1991, and now it has taken 17 years to make it again.

Why so many in the early period and then the long dry spell? The record prices of 1976 were the aftermath of the Russian grain deal and significantly higher corn prices in 1974 and 1975. Slaughter dropped from 81.7 million head in 1974 to just 68.7 million head in 1975 (Figure 2) and only recovered to 73.8 million head by 1976. The 1974 to 1976 supply decline was 10%. A 10% decline over two years in order to drive hog prices high enough to cover significantly higher feed costs. Does that sound familiar?

The next record, in 1982, came on the rebound side of the huge herd buildup in 1978 and 1979 that led to record slaughter in 1980. The 1980 slaughter record (which stood until 1995) drove hog prices into the $30s for the first time since the 1974 liquidation year and caused another dramatic reduction in supplies and a new record price.

It was nine years before hog prices would set another record, largely because of the demand difficulties of the 1980s. Fat phobia, cholesterol phobia and nitrate phobia were at the top of consumers’ minds and newspapers’ headlines and pork demand suffered. The University of Missouri’s pork demand index stood at 125.1 in 1979. Five years later, it stood at 100, meaning that the index had fallen by just over 5% per year.

By 1991, U.S. hog slaughter had still not recovered to the levels of 1981, but the “Pork: The Other White Meat” campaign and significantly higher promotional budgets funded by the mandatory checkoff (initiated in 1987) had stopped the erosion of pork demand. That combination drove hogs to their last record early in the summer of 1991.

It should be noted, though, that the 10-year period preceding that record (1980-1990) saw the largest reduction of producer numbers for any decade in history as 391,110 operations exited the pork industry. And in those days, each operation was generally an enterprise owned by one farmer – not just a physical location that is part of a larger enterprise as many hog operations are today.

Why has it taken 17 years to set another record? Three reasons:
  • Technological innovations from buildings to genetics to nutrition to management to records/analysis systems to economies of scale and size have allowed producers to consistently improve the efficiency of their operations. Back when per unit input prices were stable and relatively low, these efficiency gains resulted in cost reductions over time that allowed profits to be realized even as hog prices trended downward.

  • Consolidation of production into fewer hands also meant more pigs in each producer’s hands. This enabled producers to accept lower per-head margins and still generate enough profit to live comfortably.

  • Domestic demand has been stable, but not growing. I don’t mean to be critical in that point. A stable pork demand at a time when chicken demand was steadily growing and, at least through 1998, when beef demand was still falling is not too bad of a result. But output growth and stable demand will not often allow higher, much less record, prices.
2008 is Unique
The uniqueness of the 2008 situation should be obvious: It is the only price record that has not involved some type of output reduction. In fact, this record has been set on an output increase of nearly 9%, year-to-date. The driver, of course, is exceptionally strong hog demand driven by meat exports and record by-product values.

Which brings us to last week and a near-record large drop in hog prices. The decline of $10.89/cwt. was second only to the $10.93/cwt. decline for the week of Sept. 8, 1973. Only two other weeks, one in December 1975, another in December 2004, have seen declines of over $10/cwt.

Why the big fall? It’s not a supply issue. Slaughter last week was still over 5% larger than last year. Since we have concluded that the upward run was likely driven by export demand, this slowdown is almost surely driven by declines in export demand. We will not have data for August until mid-October, so it will be interesting to see whether this is the case or not, and if it is, to see where the exports have fallen the most. I have always been a bit concerned about post-Olympics China, but difficulties in Mexico and Russia will also contribute to the decline. Aren’t roller coaster rides fun?




Click to view graphs.

Steve R. Meyer, Ph.D.
Paragon Economics, Inc.
e-mail: steve@paragoneconomics.com



ADVERTISEMENT

New to the Team. Veteran of the Game.

Fast-acting Baytril® 100 (enrofloxacin) is approved for treatment and control of swine respiratory disease. When a proven winner joins an already great team, the results are phenomenal. So Bayer Animal Health is proud to offer Baytril 100 for treatment and control of swine respiratory disease (SRD) in all phases of production. For use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian. Swine intended for human consumption must not be slaughtered within 5 days of receiving a single injection dose.






Click on the Baytril 100 logo for more information.

Swine Health Preview
Oral Fluids Sampling Deemed Innovative
Veterinarians submit samples to diagnostic laboratories to confirm the presence of a new or recurring disease in a herd. Increasingly, veterinarians rely on laboratory testing for monitoring or surveillance.

Examples include boar studs (serology or polymerase chain reaction [PCR]) or some serology or agent detection profile of breeding herds, weaners, nurseries, growers and/or finishers. The goal is to understand disease agent interactions with swine populations and add a level of confidence to statements of disease presence or absence using statistically valid estimates.

Proper sampling is necessary to assure validity to conclusions and resulting actions. Errors multiply when too few samples or wrong samples of questionable quality are submitted. Coupled with the variety of test types and diverse interpretations that are made, one can quickly make decisions from inaccurate information.

Quick & Easy
A recent innovation is the concept of surveillance of swine populations using oral fluids (Zimmerman, Prickett). This is a quick, easy and inexpensive way to collect the equivalent of pooled serum, plus oral and respiratory exudates (discharges). Cotton ropes are suspended in a pen for 20 minutes to allow most of the pigs the chance to chew on the rope.














The saliva (oral fluid) is “milked” from the rope into a bag, then placed in a specimen tube.


































This oral fluid specimen can be submitted to the laboratory for testing using either serologic methods (detection of antibody) or agent detection (using PCR or isolation).

Evaluating Results
Serology for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus, swine influenza virus (SIV), porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) and Mycoplasmal pneumonia are validated, or nearly so. The graph below illustrates the serologic response of a group of pigs using oral fluids and adapted PRRS virus enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) testing protocol. The results demonstrate seroconversion to PRRS virus in this group of pigs, with acute infection followed by decline and perhaps continuing exposure. In fact, antibody can be detected in oral fluid before it is detected in serum, so this tool could be quite valuable for monitoring allegedly negative populations.

PCR has been applied to detect organism presence in clinical animals or shedding in asymptomatic carriers. The graph illustrates results of PCR testing for detection of SIV, PCV2 and PRRS virus from oral fluids in finishing pigs. Detection of other agents (mycoplasama, ileitis, salmonella, actinobacillus organisms) is being investigated.



Kent Schwartz, DVM
Iowa State University Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory
kschwart@iastate.edu



ADVERTISEMENT

Introducing the new PIC Camborough® Family

You asked for greater lifetime reproductive performance and longevity. You asked for more pounds of pork marketed per sow. You asked for a higher percentage of market pigs in the full-value pay box.

Take another look at our new Camborough family, we think you will like what you see--after all, it is just what you asked for. www.pic.com/usa

Legislative Preview
USDA Rule Bans Downer Cattle
USDA announced a proposed rule to amend the Federal meat inspection regulations to initiate a complete ban on the slaughter of cattle that become non-ambulatory (downer) after initial inspection by USDA personnel. Under the proposed rule, all cattle that are non-ambulatory disabled at any time prior to slaughter will be condemned and properly disposed of. Secretary of Agriculture Ed Schafer said, “To maintain consumer confidence in the food supply, eliminate further misunderstanding of the rule and ultimately to make a positive impact on the humane handling of cattle, I believe it is sound policy to simplify this matter by initiating a complete ban on the slaughter of downer cattle.” Earlier this year, the American Meat Institute, National Meat Association and National Milk Producer Federation petitioned USDA requesting the “downer” loophole by closed.

Republican Platform – End Ethanol Support — The Republican platform adopted at the Republican National Convention this week states the “U.S. government should end mandates for ethanol and let the free market work.” This is a change in policy for the Republican Party which supported ethanol in its 2004 party platform.

Record Net Farm Income — USDA’s Economic Research Service (ERS) has forecast net farm income at a record $95.7 billion for 2008, which is 10% above the $86.8 billion farmers earned in 2007, and 57% above its 10-year average of $61.1 billion. Net cash income, at $101.3 billion, is forecast to be $13.9 billion (16%) above 2007, which was the previous record.

Congress Returns Next Week — The House of Representatives and Senate will return to Washington, DC, next week after its summer recess. The major item of business will be fiscal year 2009 appropriations. None of the appropriations bills, including agriculture, have been completed. It is expected that Congress will pass a continuing resolution before it leaves the end of September to keep the government running until either November/December of this year or until early next year. A number of tax extenders (biodiesel, research and development, etc.) expired last December. Efforts will be made to extend these tax items for another year. Both parties will argue the need to complete a comprehensive energy bill, but with only three weeks of session, it will be difficult for Congress to complete action. Remember, this is an election year so both parties will be using the next three weeks to push their election-day agendas.

AgNite at Republican Convention — The Republican National Convention held “AgNite, A Celebration of America’s Food and Ag Industry.” Convention delegates, members of Congress, news media and food and agriculture industry leaders attended the event staged in Minneapolis.

P. Scott Shearer
Vice President
Bockorny Group
Washington, D.C.



ADVERTISEMENT



Pork Industry Calendar
Sept. 11, 2008: Ventilation Systems Workshop, Champaign County Fairgrounds, Urbana, OH; contact: Dale Ricker at (419) 523-6294 or ricker.37@osu.edu.

Sept. 16-17, 2008: Minnesota Nutrition Conference, Holiday Inn, Owatonna, MN; contact: Lee Johnston, West Central Research and Outreach Center at (320) 589-1711 or Becky Beyers, College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences at (612) 626-5754.

Click here to get National Hog Farmer's complete pork industry calendar.



ADVERTISEMENT



You are subscribed to this newsletter as #email#

To get this newsletter in a different format (Text or HTML), or to change your e-mail address, please visit your profile page to change your delivery preferences.

For questions concerning delivery of this newsletter, please contact our Customer Service Department at:
National Hog Farmer
A Penton Media publication
US Toll Free: 866-505-7173 International: 847-763-9504 Email:nationalhogfarmer@pbinews.com

Penton Media | 249 W. 17th Street | New York, NY 10011

Copyright 2008, Penton Media. All rights reserved. This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be reproduced, rewritten, distributed, re-disseminated, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast, directly or indirectly, in any medium without the prior written permission of Penton Media.