View this email as a Web page Please add RGR_Wealth Management Letter_ to your Safe Sender list.

SUBSCRIBE | UNSUBSCRIBE | CONTACT US 
From Registered Rep. | A Penton Media Publication April 30, 2008 |
IN THIS ISSUE
Equal-Weighted Indexing Wins Over the Long Haul

Citi Hedge Fund Blow Up Hurts Clients—And Sends Advisors Packing

BofA Earnings Tank, Retail Brokerage Steady

Citigroup Posts Q1 Loss; Smith Barney Unit Lackluster, Too






ADVERTISEMENT
Click Here
FEATURE STORY


Equal-Weighted Indexing Wins Over the Long Haul
By Kristen French
Equal and fundamental indices have outperformed market-cap weighted indices by a meaningful margin over the past 18 years, according to a recent white paper released by Standard & Poor's. But cap-weighted indices tend to outperform during bull markets, or when mega-cap growth stocks are doing best, the research showed.

The finding isn't that surprising, since Standard & Poor's research basically supports what analysts have been saying since fundamental indexes were pioneered few years ago. Since 1990, when it was created, the S&P 500 EWI (equal-weighted index) has outperformed the S&P 500 (a cap-weighted index) by 1.5 percent per year. Over the full period, the S&P 500 equal-weight index notched annualized returns of 12.0 percent versus 10.5 percent for the S&P 500.

"Over the long term, equal weighting does perform better, on an absolute and risk-adjusted basis," says Srikant Dash, head of global research and design at Standard & Poor's. Unlike cap-weighted indices, which have been around for much longer, the components of equal-weighted indices are, well, equally weighted. In other words, there is no bias towards market cap, dividends, sales or any other measure that may or may not be in favor in the markets at a particular time. "Equal weighting just randomizes your exposure to risk factors so you don't have to worry about which risk-factor exposure you want to take."

Read the full story here.


Back to Top ^

Top News of the Week


Citi Hedge Fund Blow Up Hurts Clients—And Sends Advisors Packing
By John Churchill
While Smith Barney tries its darnedest to hold on to the money of wealthy clients that were invested in two of the firms’ failing hedge funds (subscription required), it’s also having a hard time keeping some of its best brokers. With all the uncertainties and troubles facing Citi, the firm’s prized retail brokerage operation has become a favored target of recruiters, say recruiters.

According to a Journal’s “Heard On The Street” column today, the firm is offering to make clients who invested in the firm’s Falcon and ASTA/MAT hedge funds whole again. That is, just as long as they sign an agreement promising not to sue the firm at a later date. (At least one investor who put in $500,000 already filed a federal lawsuit against Citi, says the Journal. The suit alleges Smith Barney misrepresented the risk profile of the hedge funds, and that the investments were unsuitable.)

According to one Smith Barney advisor, more than a few of the brokers departing the firm in the past few months have had financial troubles of their own. One reason, he says, is directly related to those two hedge funds. “There are definitely some guys who overcommitted clients to these funds, and now they’re leaving the firm. They’re leaving the firm with the mess, saying, ‘Look what they [Citi] did.’”

Read the full story here.


Back to Top ^

ADVERTISEMENT
SIFMA's Independent Firms Conference will address these cutting-edge issues: challenges in the independent model; recruiting, retention and broker satisfaction; analysis of independent markets; and, the business of advice. Don't miss Keynote Speaker, William Dwyer III, Managing Director and President, Independent Advisor Services, LPL Financial Services. Register Today!


BofA Earnings Tank, Retail Brokerage Steady
By Christina Mucciolo
Bank of America posted a whopping 77-percent drop in first quarter net income today, down to $1.21 billion, or 23 cents a share. The sharp drop in earnings was the result of $1.9 billion in write-downs for the quarter—$1.47 billion on collateralized-debt obligations (CDOs) and $439 million on leveraged loans—as well as an increase in capital provisions to cover future potential credit losses, which rose to $6.01 billion from a $1.23 billion a year ago, according to the firm’s earnings release.

But the bank’s retail brokerage unit, Banc of America Investment Services Inc., which is part of its Premiere Banking Investment division, did all right, posting a 10-percent increase in revenue to $170 million from $154 million in the same period last year. The firm does not break out its profit numbers for the retail brokerage unit, but the entire Premier Banking and Investment division generated after-tax profits of $104 million on net revenue of $841 million.

The Premier Banking and Investments division manages $21 billion in client assets, up just barely from the year ago period’s $20 billion. Meanwhile, the 1,952 financial advisors in the full-service brokerage unit generated average annualized production of $472,000 per advisor.

Read the full story here.


Back to Top ^

ADVERTISEMENT
Presenting The 2008 Wealth Management Resource Guide

For more than 40 years, attorneys, bank trust officers, financial planners and investment consultants have relied on the Trusts & Estates Wealth Management Resource Guide as the industry's only one-stop source of trust institutions and related products and services. To order your copy click here


Citigroup Posts Q1 Loss; Smith Barney Unit Lackluster, Too
By John Churchill
Citigroup reported a net loss of $5.1 billion or $1.02 per share, $0.07 per share worse than consensus analyst expectations, according to Thomson Financial. Unlike, say, Merrill Lynch, Smith Barney’s Global Wealth Management unit (retail brokerage), one of the centerpieces in CEO Vikram Pandit’s revival, did poorly too. (Merrill reported earnings yesterday, and despite CDO woes, its retail brokerage did pretty well.)

The bank’s first quarter results include another $15.2 billion in write-downs, including: $6 billion for direct sub-prime related exposures, $3.1 billion on leveraged finance commitments, $1.5 billion on its auction-rate securities inventory, $1.5 billion related to credit exposure to monoline insurers and a $3.1 billion increase in credit costs in the global-consumer division. This week Pandit rejected talk of a break-up in an interview with Business Week, saying he “couldn’t get a better set of assets.” (That said, Pandit is getting rid of non-core businesses, such as its Diners Club International credit-card network, which it sold last week. Yesterday, Citi announced it would sell its North American commercial-lending and leasing business.)

In the release, Pandit notes, in today's press release, that the firm is still in recovery mode: “Our financial results reflect the continuation of the unprecedented market and credit environment and its impact on hour historical risk positions.” “Despite the negative factors in the broader markets, we continue to see strong momentum throughout the organization with robust volumes in many of our products and regions.”

Read the full story here.


Back to Top ^

About this Newsletter


For information on advertising in this newsletter, please contact Rich Santos, Group Publisher

To unsubscribe from this newsletter go to: Unsubscribe

To subscribe to this newsletter, go to: Subscribe



You are subscribed to this newsletter as #email#

To get this newsletter in a different format (Text or HTML), or to change your e-mail address, please visit your profile page to change your delivery preferences.

For questions concerning delivery of this newsletter, please contact our Customer Service Department at:
Registered Representative
A Penton Media publication
US Toll Free: 866-505-7173
International: 847-763-9504
Email:registeredrep@pbinews.com Penton Media | 249 W. 17th Street | New York, NY 10011

Copyright 2007, Penton Media. All rights reserved. This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be reproduced, rewritten, distributed, re-disseminated, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast, directly or indirectly, in any medium without the prior written permission of Penton Media.